12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

for <strong>the</strong> increasing risks which results from <strong>the</strong> open markets for services.<br />

However, not even <strong>the</strong> professional liability insurances or guarantee is<br />

obligatory. That means Member States may equally decide not to put pressure<br />

on service providers, in order not to discriminate <strong>the</strong>ir own national service<br />

providers against <strong>the</strong> foreign service providers which might benefit from a laxer<br />

policy.<br />

The relationship between <strong>the</strong> national rules on <strong>the</strong> liability for <strong>the</strong> safety of<br />

services and <strong>the</strong> national rules on professional liability insurances and<br />

guarantees is even more complicated. As <strong>the</strong>re are no European liability rules,<br />

<strong>the</strong> applicable law will have to be decided by <strong>the</strong> envisaged Rome II<br />

regulation 227 . This means, in essence, that <strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>the</strong> Member<br />

States’ rules on professional liability remain in principle unaffected. The<br />

consumers’ rights will entirely depend on <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> applicable law<br />

protects his or her interests. It has to be recalled that <strong>the</strong> European Commission<br />

has not systematically investigated national rules on professional liability. The<br />

Service Directive pursues a policy which is in no way based on concrete<br />

knowledge. Possible consequences in differing national legal orders were of<br />

little concern in <strong>the</strong> legislative process.<br />

However, indirectly <strong>the</strong> European Commission might affect national liability<br />

rules by way of developing common criteria for establishing equivalence. The<br />

European Commission <strong>the</strong>refore intends to catch up what it missed during <strong>the</strong><br />

preparatory works. Formally <strong>the</strong> common criteria to be developed do not affect<br />

national rules on professional liability, as <strong>the</strong> Member States are not legally<br />

obliged to compel service providers to ensure against such professional risks,<br />

but in practice <strong>the</strong> common criteria might provide ground rules for a future<br />

European law on <strong>the</strong> liability of services. This is harmonisation of liability for <strong>the</strong><br />

safety of services by <strong>the</strong> back door! The common criteria are not to be<br />

discussed in Parliament and in <strong>the</strong> Council, as <strong>the</strong>y are not submitted to <strong>the</strong><br />

normal law making procedure. The common criteria will be approved in <strong>the</strong><br />

comitology procedure, where <strong>the</strong> European Commission has a key role to play.<br />

dd) Impact on standardisation of services<br />

There is not so much room for standardisation here. The determination of <strong>the</strong><br />

equivalence is in <strong>the</strong> hands of <strong>the</strong> European Commission and <strong>the</strong> Member<br />

States. However, European technical standards could provide for professional<br />

liability insurance and/or directly lay down liability rules. European <strong>Standards</strong><br />

227 See Chapter II, II, 2.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!