12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Services</strong> <strong>Standards</strong><br />

The inactivity of <strong>the</strong> European Commission does not preclude European<br />

<strong>Standards</strong> Bodies from taking <strong>the</strong> initiative. The draft proposal for an EC<br />

directive on <strong>the</strong> liability for unsafe services, as set out by Magnus/Micklitz 253 ,<br />

provides a set of rules which might serve as a guideline for action. This draft<br />

proposal goes back to a study commissioned by DG SANCO which was aimed<br />

at analysing and comparing national case law in four selected areas: home and<br />

leisure, medial malpractices, tourism services and services of general interest.<br />

The draft proposal, however, remained purely academic and did not entail<br />

political consequences. It seems as if <strong>the</strong> European Commission is not willing to<br />

get to grips with liability for <strong>the</strong> safety of services. The green paper on <strong>the</strong><br />

review of <strong>the</strong> consumer acquis deliberately excludes <strong>the</strong> issue from <strong>the</strong><br />

agenda 254 .<br />

II.<br />

The new EC policy on technical standards<br />

1. DG ENTR/DG MARKET and CEN – development of a strategy<br />

In June 2006 <strong>the</strong> European Commission via DG Enterprise and Industry (DG<br />

ENTR) presented a background summary which allows for <strong>the</strong> re-construction<br />

of <strong>the</strong> timing of <strong>the</strong> new initiative. History demonstrates that <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Commission has systematically prepared <strong>the</strong> ground for standardising services<br />

as a supplement to <strong>the</strong> Service Directive, <strong>the</strong>reby overruling possible rejections<br />

against privatisation of safety matters. The documents enlisted below show <strong>the</strong><br />

strong interaction between <strong>the</strong> two DGs, ENTR and MARKET, with CEN on how<br />

to proceed in standardisation of services.<br />

• In October 2003 DG ENTR issued Mandate M/340 which requests a<br />

programme of standardisation from CEN, CENELEC and ETSI to support<br />

<strong>the</strong> Internal Market in services 255 . Mandate M/340 must be placed in <strong>the</strong><br />

context of <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> Service Directive. It explicitly refers to<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall EC policy on services and to <strong>the</strong> Council Resolution on <strong>the</strong><br />

Safety of <strong>Services</strong>. The major purpose of <strong>the</strong> Mandate is to invite <strong>the</strong><br />

European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies to present a working programme which will<br />

serve as a basis for fur<strong>the</strong>r standardisation mandates.<br />

• In December 2003 <strong>the</strong> Commission Communication on <strong>the</strong><br />

competitiveness of business-related services stresses <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

standardisation in <strong>the</strong> field of services 256 . The idea here is to increase<br />

253 Liability for <strong>the</strong> Safety of <strong>Services</strong>, 2006.<br />

254 COM (2006) 744 final, 8.2.2007.<br />

255 http://www.cenorm.be/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/services/m340.pdf.<br />

256 COM (2003) 747 final, 4.12.2003 under 3.1.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!