Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Services</strong> <strong>Standards</strong><br />
The inactivity of <strong>the</strong> European Commission does not preclude European<br />
<strong>Standards</strong> Bodies from taking <strong>the</strong> initiative. The draft proposal for an EC<br />
directive on <strong>the</strong> liability for unsafe services, as set out by Magnus/Micklitz 253 ,<br />
provides a set of rules which might serve as a guideline for action. This draft<br />
proposal goes back to a study commissioned by DG SANCO which was aimed<br />
at analysing and comparing national case law in four selected areas: home and<br />
leisure, medial malpractices, tourism services and services of general interest.<br />
The draft proposal, however, remained purely academic and did not entail<br />
political consequences. It seems as if <strong>the</strong> European Commission is not willing to<br />
get to grips with liability for <strong>the</strong> safety of services. The green paper on <strong>the</strong><br />
review of <strong>the</strong> consumer acquis deliberately excludes <strong>the</strong> issue from <strong>the</strong><br />
agenda 254 .<br />
II.<br />
The new EC policy on technical standards<br />
1. DG ENTR/DG MARKET and CEN – development of a strategy<br />
In June 2006 <strong>the</strong> European Commission via DG Enterprise and Industry (DG<br />
ENTR) presented a background summary which allows for <strong>the</strong> re-construction<br />
of <strong>the</strong> timing of <strong>the</strong> new initiative. History demonstrates that <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Commission has systematically prepared <strong>the</strong> ground for standardising services<br />
as a supplement to <strong>the</strong> Service Directive, <strong>the</strong>reby overruling possible rejections<br />
against privatisation of safety matters. The documents enlisted below show <strong>the</strong><br />
strong interaction between <strong>the</strong> two DGs, ENTR and MARKET, with CEN on how<br />
to proceed in standardisation of services.<br />
• In October 2003 DG ENTR issued Mandate M/340 which requests a<br />
programme of standardisation from CEN, CENELEC and ETSI to support<br />
<strong>the</strong> Internal Market in services 255 . Mandate M/340 must be placed in <strong>the</strong><br />
context of <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> Service Directive. It explicitly refers to<br />
<strong>the</strong> overall EC policy on services and to <strong>the</strong> Council Resolution on <strong>the</strong><br />
Safety of <strong>Services</strong>. The major purpose of <strong>the</strong> Mandate is to invite <strong>the</strong><br />
European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies to present a working programme which will<br />
serve as a basis for fur<strong>the</strong>r standardisation mandates.<br />
• In December 2003 <strong>the</strong> Commission Communication on <strong>the</strong><br />
competitiveness of business-related services stresses <strong>the</strong> role of<br />
standardisation in <strong>the</strong> field of services 256 . The idea here is to increase<br />
253 Liability for <strong>the</strong> Safety of <strong>Services</strong>, 2006.<br />
254 COM (2006) 744 final, 8.2.2007.<br />
255 http://www.cenorm.be/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/services/m340.pdf.<br />
256 COM (2003) 747 final, 4.12.2003 under 3.1.<br />
75