08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

The distinction between the various pests and coverage by the two sets of legislation is<br />

graphically depicted below:<br />

Figure 3-6: Positioning of RNQPs<br />

Regulated pests<br />

Quarantine<br />

pests: zero<br />

tolerance<br />

within the EU<br />

Regulated non -<br />

quarantine pests<br />

Quality<br />

diseases &<br />

pests<br />

Source: FCEC<br />

The phytosanitary measures for RNQPs should be technically justified as required by the IPPC<br />

1997. The classification of a pest as a RNQP and any restrictions placed on the import of the<br />

plant species with which it is associated should be justified by PRA (for which an international<br />

standard exists, ISPM 21) 97 . It is also necessary to demonstrate that plants for planting, including<br />

seeds, potted plants and bonsai are the main pathway for the pest and that the plants for planting<br />

are the main source of infestation (transmission pathway) of the pest that results in an<br />

economically unacceptable impact on the intended use of those plants. It is not necessary to<br />

evaluate the probability of establishment, the long-term economic impact of a RNQP nor the<br />

environmental effects, as RNQPs are organisms which are already present.<br />

Following the publication of ISPM 16, the EU set up a Commission working group on<br />

―Regulated Non-Quarantine Pests‖ in EC legislation with the aim of exchanging information on<br />

this issue and to discuss elements related to the criteria that define RNQPs. A Commission paper<br />

entitled ―Reflections on Community strategy for RNQPs‖ and a <strong>report</strong> to the Standing<br />

Committee on Plant Health 98 have been the two main deliverables of this working group.<br />

The WG Report identifies Directive 2000/29/EC as the legal basis to provide mechanisms for<br />

control of RNQPs 99 and envisages three different scenarios to introduce and implement the<br />

97 According to ISPM 21, the objectives of a PRA for RNQPs are, for a specified PRA area, to identify pests<br />

associated with plants for planting, to evaluate their risk and, if appropriate, to identify risk management options to<br />

achieve a tolerance level. ISPM 21 is only to be used for seeds and plants for planting, to define the acceptable<br />

tolerance level, and this level should apply both for import requirements and domestic production.<br />

98 Report of the Commission Working Group on ―RNQPs‖ in EC legislation, Brussels, 13 and 14 May 2004.<br />

99 In particular: imports: Article 3(4): tolerances via comitology; intra-EU trade: Article 3(4) and Article 3(3) ;<br />

inspection: Article 6 ; recognition of protected zones: if not the whole EC is relevant: Article 2.1(h); the use of plant<br />

passports: Article 10.1 or 10.2.<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!