2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report
DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)
EQ Question
Report section
between national authorities and private sector in the 5.7 (future: incentives)
implementation38 of the CPHR?
13 In how far do the FVO plant health activities ensure the harmonised
implementation of Community provisions by MS and third country
3.4 (past)
5.2 (future: imports)
compliance?
14 In how far does the EUROPHYT tool address the needs for rapid
exchange of information on interceptions and provision of statistics?
3.4 (past)
5.2 (future: imports)
What are its critical success factors and are any changes needed?
15 How effective is the functioning of the CPHR as for communication
and consultation?
3.10.4 (past)
5.8.5 (future)
16 To what extent is the CPHR supported by an appropriate diagnostic
infrastructure, allowing for rapid and reliable diagnosis of all
3.9.2.1 (past)
5.8.2 (future)
regulated HOs?
17 What would be the pros and cons of CRLs? 3.4 (past)
5.2 (future)
18 In how far have the CPHR requirements for appropriate training of
MS plant health inspectors and diagnosticians been met and how can
3.9.2.2 (past)
5.8.3 (future)
this be improved?
19 In how far is the CPHR adequately supported by research and 3.9.1 (past)
development?
20 In how far is the CPHR appropriately connected and appropriately 3.12
coordinated with related Community regimes?
21 In how far has the CPHR successfully prevented the entry,
establishment and spread of HOs and what were the social, economic
and environmental impacts?
3.11.1 (past)
5.2 (future)
22 What are the costs and benefits of the CPHR? 3.11 (past)
5.2 (future)
23 What are the major strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and
threats of the CPHR, based on the conclusions of all previous
questions, and which areas of improvement can be identified?
4.1.1
24 In how far is the CPHR suitable to mitigate risks of future challenges,
in particular the control of new HOs reaching or spreading in the
Community as a consequence of climate change?
25 Which IPPC guidelines and WTO-SPS rules should be better taken
into account in the CPHR?
26 What economic impacts do any differences in standards between EU
producers and key international trading partners have on Community
trade, and is there a need that EU societal concerns and legitimate
factors would be better reflected in the implementation of international
and bilateral rules?
27 How many financial resources should be mobilised and are the
necessary financial instruments for the CPHR in place? Is Community
financing of the CPHR justified?
28 What options exist to strengthen and modernise the CPHR, so as to
better reach its objectives and serve the needs of society? Where is
simplification possible, which areas need more harmonisation, and
how can this be achieved?
4.1.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
2.9 (past)
5.9 (future)
Options developed,
presented and analysed
in section 5
Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 39