08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

HO Key host Estimated benefit<br />

plant(s)<br />

Thrips palmi horticulture MS: England (Source: ADAS (2000))<br />

Estimated benefit: Net Social Benefit: £2.2 million<br />

Benefit : Cost ratio of current policy (£36,000 per year): 7.4:1 over 15 years period.<br />

Erwinia amylovora fruit trees Source: cost survey<br />

(apple/pear) 7 MS (EE, FR, IE, IT, LT, SI, SK) have indicated that the measures taken under the current CPHR are<br />

considered to have been of economic (and environmental) benefit, both in commercial sector and for<br />

public/private green and biodiversity. In the commercial fruit production, in 5/7 MS, an area of 176,000 ha of<br />

susceptible fruit tree species is estimated to be protected by the current measures. (Details in the case study<br />

Grapevine<br />

dorée<br />

Flavescence<br />

Anoplophora chinensis &<br />

glabripennis<br />

Phytophthora ramorum<br />

grapevine<br />

fruit, ornamental<br />

and amenity trees<br />

fruit, ornamental<br />

and amenity trees<br />

PWN Pine and<br />

coniferous trees<br />

Ceratocystis fagacearum<br />

(oak wilt) & fimbriata<br />

(brown rot)<br />

oak trees<br />

below.)<br />

Source: cost survey<br />

5 MS (FR, IT, SI, SK, PT) have indicated that the measures taken under the current CPHR are considered to<br />

have been of economic benefit, ultimately protecting a total susceptible area of 1.14 million ha (details in the<br />

case study below).<br />

Source: cost survey<br />

7 MS (BE, CZ, DE, DK, IT, LT, NL) have indicated that the measures taken under the current CPHR are<br />

considered to have been of economic (and environmental) benefit both in the commercial sector and for<br />

public/private green (details in the case study below).<br />

Source: cost survey<br />

15 MS (BE, CZ, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, IE, LT, LV, NL, SE, SI, SK, UK) have indicated that the measures taken<br />

under the current CPHR are considered to have been of economic (and environmental) benefit both in the<br />

commercial sector and for public/private green. Although a total overview of the susceptible area and number of<br />

nurseries could not be provided (few MS provided data), in 2 MS (CZ, SI) the total susceptible area is 0.8<br />

million ha of deciduous trees, and in 2 other MS (FR, ES), over 2,600 susceptible nurseries are thus protected.<br />

(Details in the case study below.)<br />

Source: DEFRA (2009)<br />

Estimated benefit: Net Social Benefit: Net Benefit Range (NPV) £ 7 – 16 million; NET BENEFIT (NPV Best<br />

estimate) £ 13.9 million (The spread of the diseases and thus most of the costs and benefits are subject to a high<br />

level of uncertainty. Therefore sensitivity analysis was carried out.<br />

Source: cost survey<br />

9 MS (BE, CZ, DE, ES, FR, IT, PT SE, SI) have indicated that the measures taken under the current CPHR are<br />

considered to have been of economic (and environmental) benefit, ultimately protecting a total susceptible forest<br />

area of 16.3 million ha (6/9MS).<br />

Source: cost survey<br />

7 MS (DE, DK, FR, IE, IT, PT, SE) have indicated that the measures taken under the current CPHR are<br />

considered to have been of economic (and environmental) benefit both in commercial sector and for<br />

FCEC 208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!