08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Protected Zones system: preliminary analysis of each option<br />

Option: Description Impact Advantages Disadvantages<br />

b. Abolition of PZ<br />

system<br />

Use alternative models of<br />

regionalisation to guarantee<br />

pest free status (i.e. PFA),<br />

including demarcated<br />

infested zones.<br />

Approach can be based on<br />

voluntary or/and mandatory<br />

models<br />

Impacts to be largely dependent on<br />

models to be developed;<br />

Low to high positive impact of<br />

effectiveness and efficiency as PH<br />

measures to be optimised to<br />

regional needs.<br />

Simplification in case of<br />

voluntary systems;<br />

Potential gain for some<br />

importers/exporters that<br />

currently incur higher costs<br />

as a result of PZ system;<br />

Better focus on more<br />

effective PH measures<br />

adapted to regional<br />

environment;<br />

Complex to implement in case<br />

of EU mandatory systems;<br />

May introduce difficulties for<br />

free movement within EU;<br />

Will not allow imposing<br />

quarantine on imports from<br />

third countries in current PZs,<br />

thus removing current<br />

protection (in cases where<br />

current protection is effective)<br />

and reducing scope for<br />

eradication (in cases where this<br />

might be feasible);<br />

Possible loss of any current<br />

trade advantages with regards<br />

to exports from PZ zones;<br />

Will require a complete reorganisation<br />

in MS where PZs<br />

are largely used;<br />

May compromise more than<br />

current PZ system both<br />

phytosanitary status and<br />

credibility to third countries, if<br />

PFA status cannot be<br />

efficiently monitored and<br />

guaranteed (more difficult<br />

application than PZs).<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 362

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!