08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Understanding the evidence needs for policy:<br />

Understanding the context – fundamental processes and phenomena of plant and plantpathogen<br />

biology, baselines and benchmarks for plant health and disease;<br />

Development of models, methodologies and tools for rapid diagnosis, assessment of<br />

possible actions and monitoring of outcomes;<br />

Developing and using the evidence base to help set targets and formulate policy;<br />

Improving outputs through:<br />

The development and appraisal of options/solutions for plant health and disease<br />

management;<br />

Optimum decisions and effective implementation through communication, engagement a<br />

consultation, to influence changes;<br />

Monitoring & evaluating outcomes and impacts of policy – economic, environmental, social and<br />

human health<br />

Monitoring progress towards policy/programme targets;<br />

Policy/programme evaluation.<br />

DEFRA (2006) Evidence and Innovation strategy - Summary of Plant Health Evidence and Innovation needs<br />

During the evaluation, the extent to which current R&D development in the EU (whether EU or<br />

MS funded) has addressed the right priorities was explored:<br />

General survey results<br />

Q8.2 Extent to which R&D development in the EU has targeted the right priorities in plant health field<br />

MS CA<br />

Stakeholders (a)<br />

EC funded research (FP programmes)<br />

Fully 5 out of 23 1 out of 24<br />

Partly 13 out of 23 8 out of 24<br />

Not at all 0 out of 23 0 out of 24<br />

Do not know 5 out of 23 15 out of 24<br />

MS funded research<br />

Fully 4 out of 23 1 out of 23<br />

Partly 12 out of 23 5 out of 23<br />

Not at all 4 out of 23 0 out of 23<br />

Do not know 3 out of 23 17 out of 23<br />

(a) The large number of „do not know‟ in the case of stakeholders is justified by the relatively more limited visibility<br />

of this type of research to stakeholders.<br />

For the majority of respondents to the general survey, research and development in the EU is<br />

considered to have at least partly or fully targeted the right priorities in the field of plant health,<br />

especially in the case of EU funded R&D.<br />

MS CAs, in particular, have nonetheless highlighted that there is scope for further alignment of<br />

research funding to actual priorities. A clear persisting challenge in the existing situation is that<br />

the policy and legislation that underpins phytosanitary policy is determined at EU level but most<br />

of the research that supports policy development and implementation is done by MS. As stated<br />

earlier, plant health research activities are mainly commissioned under national MS budgets<br />

(accounting for roughly 90% of all such budgets available in the EU), while the policy is defined<br />

at the EU level. As a consequence, there are often differences between MS and EU priorities.<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!