2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) 3.3 Surveillance provisions This section summarises the findings of the evaluation on the CPHR performance to date, taking into consideration EQ 6 (area B) of the ToR. EQ6: What provisions exist in Member States for general surveillance for the presence of listed organisms, non-listed organisms, and organisms for which emergency measures are in place, in relation to pest status, and how are they implemented? The aim of surveillance is to monitor the emergence and evolution of new risks so as to provide early warning. Surveillance in the field of plant health can be distinguished into: a) general monitoring, b) import monitoring, c) export monitoring and d) area-wide monitoring (more details are provided in Annex I, Theme I). General surveillance is currently carried out entirely on a voluntary basis. The only obligations established at EU level are in the case of emergency and control measures, and in protected zones (PZs). 3.3.1 Compulsory surveillance The CPHR specifies that surveillance is compulsory in protected zones, under certain emergency measures and control measures as follows: Article 2(1)(h) of Directive 2000/29/EC requires that MS shall conduct regular and systematic surveys for the presence of the organism in respect of the protected zone that has been recognized. The implementation of the PZ system is being discussed in Section 3.6. Emergency Commission Decisions and control measures Council Directives provide that MS shall conduct official specific surveys for the presence of HOs in the EU. The implementation of these Directives is being discussed in Section 3.7. The list of mandatory surveillance plans is defined in the relevant legislation, as follows: Table 3-4: List of obligations for mandatory surveillance in the MS Emergency measures Emergency measures against Thrips palmi as regards Thailand Emergency measures against Phytophthora ramorum Emergency measures against Diabrotica virgifera Emergency measures against Pepino mosaic virus * Emergency measures against Pinewood nematode Commission Decision 98/109/EC Commission Decision 2002/757/EC Commission Decision 2003/766/EC Commission Decision 2004/200/EC Commission Decision 2006/133/EC as last amended by Decision 2009/420/EC Requirement for establishment of an official survey programme NO YES (Article 6(1)) Reporting by Dec. 1 st of each year YES (Article 6(1)) Reporting by Dec. 31 st of each year YES (Article 4) YES (Article 3(B) and Article 4) Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 76
Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) Emergency measures Emergency measures against Dryocosmus kuriphilus Emergency measures against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Emergency measures against Potato spindle tuber viroid * Emergency measures against Gibberella circinata Commission Decision 2006/464/EC Commission Decision 2007/365/EC Commission Decision 2007/410/EC Commission Decision 2007/433/EC Requirement for establishment of an official survey programme YES (Article 5(1)) Reporting by Dec. 31 st of each year YES (Article 5(1)) Reporting by Feb.28 st of each year YES (Article 3(1)) YES (Article 5(1)) Reporting by Dec. 15 st of each year Emergency measures against Anoplophora chinensis (Forster) Emergency measures for import Emergency measures against Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) as regards Egypt Emergency measures in respect of certain citrus fruits originating in Argentina or Brazil Community control measures Community control measures for potato wart disease Community control measures for potato cyst eelworm Commission Decision 2008/840/EC YES (Article 4) Reporting by April 30 st of each year Commission Decision 2004/4/EC Not appropriate. The emergency measures pertain to import from Egypt,MS have to check and also carry out random sampling and testing. Commission Decision N.A. 2004/416/EC as amended Council Directive 69/464/EEC Council Directive 69/465/EEC [will be repealed by Council Directive 2007/33/EC (in force as from 1/7/2010)] Control of carnation leaf-rollers Council Directive 74/647/EEC NO Community control measures Council Directive 93/85/EEC as YES Article 2.1 for potato ring rot amended. Community control measures Council Directive 98/57/EC as YES Article 2.1 for potato brown rot amended * No longer formally required in legislation, but agreement with MS that reporting will continue Source: compiled by FCEC, on the basis of the relevant legislation The notification to the FVO of results of annual surveillance related to emergency and control measures is an annual obligation of MS. Data on reporting by MS (notifications of the results of surveys in PZs) confirm that the majority of MS report the findings for the PZs established in the country to the Commission annually, whereas for some countries this is subject to a very discontinuous trend and in the case of one country there has been no reporting activity in the last years for several HOs. These issues are further explored in section 3.6. With regard to mandatory surveillance requested by emergency and control measures, data compiled by the FVO 103 confirm that not all MS annually report to the Commission on the surveys conducted, or do not perform mandatory surveys at all. Experts‘ interviews also suggest NO YES 103 The FVO compiles annually tables on the survey results notified by the MS. This has historically been done by the FVO, although it is not an element of FVO‘s mission. Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 77
Page 1 and 2:
I European Commission Directorate G
Page 3 and 4:
Expert Team Agra CEAS Consulting: D
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
7. Implementation of control and em
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Table 1-4: Obligations, tasks, volu
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Nb Title of the obligation of the P
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 63 and 64: Protection of the EU against the ha
Page 85 and 86: Figure 3-3: Definitions of potentia
Page 109: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 131 and 132: Source: FCEC based on general surve
Page 159 and 160: 3.5.7 Conclusions on performance of
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
3.8 Export, transit and re-export i
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
PWN Key host plant(s) Estimated pot
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Table 3-20 Estimated potential bene
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3-33: Completed EU standard r
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Table 3-36: Key conclusions from th
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Policy area Evaluation Question (a)
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Source: FCEC, based on results of t
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Eichhornia crassipes (aquatic plant
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Options (most recommended) 6.Emerge
show all

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?