2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) R&D programmes and funding schemes (e.g. ERA-net, networks of excellence, etc) is crucial, but currently not perceived to be sufficient. DG RTD supports the coordination of plant health research activities commissioned under national MS budgets (which roughly account for 90% of all such budgets available in the EU), through the ERA-net EUPHRESCO. The establishment of this network is perceived to be a significant step forward in the direction of establishing a coordinated EU R&D approach and there is wide support for its continuation in future. EFSA can contribute to the harmonisation of the framework for PRA and the identification and evaluation of risk management options. However, the role of EFSA does not encompass the economic (cost/benefit) analysis required in full PRAs according to ISPM 11 and 21 and WTO- SPS. It is therefore important to find an appropriate platform to carry out this type of analysis, which at present is provided on an ad hoc and exceptional basis through impact assessments. In this context, the outputs of the EU FP7-funded project PRATIQUE are expected to provide generic economic and modelling techniques to support the development of decision support tools for pest management. Finally there is a concern that the PRA process per se is becoming increasingly complex and this can inhibit timely decision-making to the detriment of effective and efficient plant health management. Moving forward, the need to create a more permanent platform to ensure the continuity of the coordination and support of research and development in this field has been identified; this issue is explored further in section 5.8.1. 3.9.2 Diagnostic laboratories and training 3.9.2.1 Diagnostic capacity This section summarises the findings of the evaluation on the CPHR performance to date, taking into consideration EQ 16 and EQ 18 (area G) of the ToR. EQ16. To what extent is the CPHR supported by an appropriate diagnostic infrastructure, allowing for rapid and reliable diagnosis of all regulated HOs? EQ18. In how far have the CPHR requirements for appropriate training of MS plant health inspectors and diagnosticians been met and how can this be improved? The general survey has provided a broad picture of the current diagnostic capacity in MS: Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 164
Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) General survey results: 7.7. Diagnostic laboratories carrying out official analysis* a. Does the current diagnostic infrastructure allow for rapid and reliable diagnosis of all regulated HOs? For the majority of MS (17 out of 25) and stakeholders (11 out of 24, 8 do not know) the current diagnostic infrastructure allows partly for rapid and reliable diagnosis of all regulated HOs; for 8 CAs and 4 stakeholders it does it fully. b. Is the necessary diagnostic expertise available for all disciplines (entomology, acarology, nematology, mycology, bacteriology, virology)? The majority of MS CAs (13 out of 25) respondents believe that the necessary diagnostic expertise is available for all the disciplines**, whereas for 6 is only partly available and for 6 it is partly available but it is threatened; c. Is the laboratory infrastructure adequate and is the necessary equipment available? The laboratory infrastructure is considered adequate and the equipment available by the majority of the respondent MS CAs (13 out of 25), only partly by 11 and not at all by one; d. Are well-maintained reference collections available for all listed HOs and is future availability of these collections ensured? Well-maintained reference collections are available for all listed HOs and future availability of these collections is ensured only partly, according to 15 MS CAs (out of 25), it is threatened, according to 7 MS CAs and not available by one MS CAs. e. For how many listed HOs are ring-tested and validated diagnostic and detection methods available? Ring-tested and validated diagnostic and detection methods are available for less than 50 HOs, according to 22 (out of 24, 2 do not know) MS CAs; for 100-250 HOs and for 50-100 HOs according to one MS CA respectively; f. How many of the 250 regulated HOs can the official laboratories in your country detect / diagnose by themselves? Official laboratories in the MS can detect/diagnose a variable number of HOs, according to 24 MS CAs responses (1 do not know): All HOs: 3 100-250 HOs: 7 50-100 HOs: 8
Page 1 and 2:
I European Commission Directorate G
Page 3 and 4:
Expert Team Agra CEAS Consulting: D
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
7. Implementation of control and em
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Table 1-4: Obligations, tasks, volu
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Nb Title of the obligation of the P
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Protection of the EU against the ha
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3-3: Definitions of potentia
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Source: FCEC based on general surve
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 159 and 160: 3.5.7 Conclusions on performance of
Page 185 and 186: 3.8 Export, transit and re-export i
Page 197: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 231 and 232: PWN Key host plant(s) Estimated pot
Page 241 and 242: Table 3-20 Estimated potential bene
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3-33: Completed EU standard r
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Table 3-36: Key conclusions from th
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Policy area Evaluation Question (a)
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Source: FCEC, based on results of t
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Eichhornia crassipes (aquatic plant
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Options (most recommended) 6.Emerge
show all

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?