08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

CAs<br />

Stakeholders<br />

Eradicated Controlled Spreading Eradicated Controlled Spreading<br />

Emergency measures<br />

Thrips palmi 87% 86% 0% 100% 100% 0%<br />

Phytophtora ramorum 38% 87% 35% 14% 86% 83%<br />

Diabotrica virgifera 21% 93% 81% 0% 0% 100%<br />

Pepino mosaic virus 67% 89% 27% 25% 83% 0%<br />

Pine wood nematode 83% 100% 17% 14% 71% 67%<br />

Dryocosmus kuriphilus 63% 90% 30% 0% 0% 100%<br />

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus 63% 92% 50% 0% 0% 75%<br />

Potato spindle tuber viroid 77% 100% 0% 67% 100% 0%<br />

Gibberella circinata 60% 100% 20% 0% 0% 100%<br />

Anoplophora chinensis 67% 100% 0% 67% 86% 67%<br />

Control measures<br />

Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. sepedonicus 69% 16% 29% 20% 86% 50%<br />

Ralstonia solanacearum 45% 100% 18% 25% 100% 67%<br />

Potato wart disease 75% 100% 10% 20% 100% 67%<br />

Potato cyst nematode 18% 95% 44% 0% 67% 100%<br />

Carnation leaf-rollers 33% 71% 0% 0% 100% 0%<br />

* Percentage of respondents to the general survey who answered ‗yes‘ (rather than ‗no‘) to Q 6.6<br />

Source: FCEC, based on general survey results<br />

The most important difficulties in implementing measures to eradicate or control HOs include<br />

(according to both MS CAs and stakeholders) the delays in notification of outbreaks, the lack of<br />

incentives for producers to declare new findings, and the lack of sufficient information exchange/<br />

communication between MS. Beyond these elements, the CAs and the stakeholders tend to<br />

attach varying significance to other difficulties, for example the lack of capacity/resources to<br />

conduct PRAs and to survey for the presence of the HO at NPPO level is noted more by the CAs<br />

and less by the stakeholders.<br />

General survey results<br />

Q6.3 What difficulties have been experienced in defining and implementing measures for the eradication<br />

and/or control of HOs:<br />

CAs<br />

Stakeholders<br />

Yes No Do not know Yes No Do not know<br />

Lack of access to the latest scientific information 7 15 3 6 6 11<br />

Difficulties in identifying HOs (i.e. not listed) 8 17 1 7 6 10<br />

Lack of capacity at MS level to survey the presence of the HO 12 13 1 7 4 12<br />

Lack of information between MS 13 13 0 13 0 10<br />

Delays in implementing the official measures 13 13 0 4 6 13<br />

Lack of resources at MS level to survey the presence of the HO 16 9 1 7 3 12<br />

Delays in notification of outbreaks by the MS 19 6 1 13 3 7<br />

Lack of incentive for the producers to declare new findings of HOs 20 4 2 9 4 9<br />

Lack of capacities for MS CAs to conduct PRAs 20 6 0 4 4 15<br />

Lack of resources for MS CAs to conduct PRAs 21 5 0 6 5 12<br />

Figure 3-14: Difficulties in defining & implementing measures to eradicate or control (CAs)<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!