08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

availability for training and, more importantly, the lack of communication and cooperation<br />

among inspectors of different MS. In the view of the majority of MS CAs training at national<br />

and EU level needs to be continued and strengthened.<br />

Some EU-funded training in the field of plant health to EU NPPO services was provided in<br />

2008 and 2009 within the BTSF (Better Training for Safer Food) program.<br />

The respondents to the general survey revealed the overall degree of satisfaction with the<br />

training provided under BTSF and pointed to the need to strengthen and continue this<br />

training, as well as some potential areas for improvement:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The training needs more focus on practical inspection performance and systematic,<br />

including sampling. In particular, training on inspections should be provided by FVO<br />

or COPHs services (and the logistics aspect left to consultants);<br />

It is remarked that the regulatory/official position of DG SANCO should be also<br />

clarified during the training sessions;<br />

Language is a barrier to the participation and the exchange of knowledge in the view<br />

of several MS CAs and it is responsible for low participation of inspectors from some<br />

countries. It is therefore suggested that the ‗training the trainers‘ approach of BTSF is<br />

strengthened in this case, for example by follow up to ensure training dissemination;<br />

Include diagnostics in the BTSF training programme.<br />

One of the positive results of the training was indeed the fact of promoting exchange of<br />

experience between inspectors of EU countries. However, for the regime to be efficient it is<br />

strongly stressed from many parts that more cooperation and communication between<br />

inspectors is needed. For example, some MS stressed the fact that inspectors are very<br />

concerned that there is no official route for MS inspectorates to talk to each other.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The evaluation highlighted the reduced availability of training and significant variability<br />

among MS in the level and quality of resources for training activities. Coupled with the lack<br />

of communication and cooperation among inspectors of different MS, this concurs to the<br />

limited harmonisation of inspection practices and the variability in the effectiveness of import<br />

inspections among MS.<br />

Some EU-funded training in the field of plant health to EU NPPO services was provided in<br />

2008 and 2009 under the BTSF (Better Training for Safer Food) program. It is recommended<br />

that this training is strengthened and continued, and that it is provided both for inspectors and<br />

diagnosticians (section Error! Reference source not found.).<br />

FCEC 177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!