08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5-3: Examples of IAS under each option and preliminary anticipated impacts<br />

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Option/Example<br />

of HO to be<br />

included<br />

Affects Economic impact Current<br />

classification<br />

Option ii:<br />

Cyperus esculentus Agriculture Evidence from NL:<br />

Phytosanitary measures. The successful<br />

elimination of yellow nutsedge from the entire<br />

gladioli propagation crop had a cost of<br />

approximately €1.5 – 3 million.<br />

Calculations In the NL showed considerable<br />

damage.<br />

Losses for operators: In 1984 calculations<br />

showed that a standard arable farm would face a<br />

decrease in net profits from € 1000 (no<br />

infestation) to less than €100 /ha per year. The<br />

total loss of a flower bulb crop may easily<br />

account to over €50.000 /ha, not counting the<br />

loss of land value that could be estimated to be<br />

the same.<br />

Option iii:<br />

Hydrocotyle<br />

ranunculoides<br />

(aquatic plant)<br />

Freshwater systems (slow<br />

flowing waters,<br />

degradation of aquatic<br />

ecosystem, loss of<br />

biodiversity)<br />

Medium to high risk. Economic impacts include<br />

management costs of the species and flooding of<br />

areas. Any economic benefit of the introduction<br />

of this plant as an ornamental aquatic plant is<br />

heavily outweighed by management costs.<br />

Flooding may also occur. It is very likely that<br />

these impacts would occur when the plant is<br />

introduced.<br />

Source (EPPO PRA, 2005 – revised by EFSA)<br />

Non-classified<br />

organism without<br />

any EPPO status.<br />

Listed by EPPO<br />

as A2 in 2005.<br />

Type of measures<br />

Measures in NL (aimed at<br />

containment) included the following:<br />

Prohibit import of nutsedge<br />

infested PM;<br />

Surveys;<br />

Official declaration of infested<br />

status of fields;<br />

Prohibit the use of infested fields<br />

for the production of PM other<br />

than seed or cuttings;<br />

Destruction of infested PM.<br />

Cleaning of machinery used on<br />

infested land.<br />

For eradication purposes effective<br />

measures did also include a ban of<br />

growing all rootcrops on all land<br />

declared nutsedge infested (lifting of<br />

the declaration after at least three<br />

consecutive seasons without any<br />

visually presence of nutsedge).<br />

Import controls (no trade of plant)<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!