08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

CONTENTS<br />

KEY MESSAGES OF THE EVALUATION ...................................................................................................... I<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. III<br />

1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................1<br />

1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................................ 1<br />

1.2 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................... 2<br />

1.3 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................................................... 2<br />

1.3.1 Geographical coverage...................................................................................................................... 2<br />

1.3.2 Time period........................................................................................................................................ 3<br />

1.3.3 Thematic coverage ............................................................................................................................ 3<br />

1.4 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

1.4.1 Overview of methodological approach ............................................................................................. 4<br />

1.4.2 Literature review ............................................................................................................................... 5<br />

1.4.3 General survey of Competent Authorities and stakeholders ............................................................. 6<br />

1.4.4 Expert interviews ............................................................................................................................... 7<br />

1.4.5 MS field visits ..................................................................................................................................... 8<br />

1.4.6 Comparison with third countries ....................................................................................................... 9<br />

1.4.7 Further Competent Authority and stakeholder consultations ......................................................... 10<br />

1.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER OPERATIONAL COSTS) ........................................................... 10<br />

1.5.1 Specific cost survey .......................................................................................................................... 10<br />

1.5.2 Development of a cost matrix and cost model ................................................................................ 11<br />

1.5.3 Legal obligations considered in the analysis of the costs of the CPHR ............................................ 14<br />

1.5.4 Data sources and reliability ............................................................................................................. 20<br />

2 REFERENCE MODEL: THE CURRENT CPHR ................................................................................... 21<br />

2.1 LEGAL BASIS............................................................................................................................................. 21<br />

2.2 EVOLUTION OF THE CPHR TO DATE .............................................................................................................. 21<br />

2.3 INTERVENTION LOGIC AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................... 23<br />

2.4 DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................................. 26<br />

2.5 OVERVIEW OF THE CPHR MAIN INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................... 28<br />

2.6 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES.................................................................................................... 33<br />

2.7 MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND COMITOLOGY ............................................................................................. 34<br />

2.8 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 36<br />

2.9 EU FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONTRIBUTION ........................................................................................... 36<br />

3 EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CPHR TO DATE ............................................. 38<br />

3.1 SCOPE OF THE CPHR................................................................................................................................. 40<br />

3.1.1 Natural spread ................................................................................................................................ 40<br />

3.1.2 IAS ................................................................................................................................................... 50<br />

3.2 CLASSIFICATION OF HOS ............................................................................................................................ 60<br />

3.2.1 Current approach for listing HOs in Directive 2000/29/EC .............................................................. 60<br />

3.2.2 The positioning of Regulated Non Quarantine Pests (RNQPs) ........................................................ 69<br />

3.2.3 Conclusions on performance of the classification system ............................................................... 75<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!