08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

General survey results<br />

Q3.1.m Extent to which the additional declaration on phytosanitary certificate has been effective in<br />

preventing the introduction of HOs into the Community:<br />

18 out of 26 MS CAs and 12 out of 23 stakeholders consider that the additional declaration has been effective in<br />

preventing the introduction of HOs (5 MS CA and 8 stakeholders do not know).<br />

Annex VI specifies plants and plant products to which special arrangements may applied (this<br />

provision is described further in Annex 1 (Theme 2). Only four Member States <strong>report</strong>ed (general<br />

survey, Q3.7) that they apply special arrangements for the import of plant products (concerns<br />

four categories of products for which the phytosanitary risk may develop while in storage, as<br />

specified in Annex VI), as follows:<br />

IT: specific requirements regarding import of dry cereals and vegetables;<br />

DE: options to inspect stored products, which is partially used;<br />

IE: importers should notify the Department 48 hours in advance of the intended arrival of<br />

any regulated material.<br />

BG: minimal equipment on Border Inspection Posts;<br />

This situation illustrates that this option is not widely used by MS and therefore it can be<br />

concluded that it is only useful in a very limited number of cases (in the general survey, 2 out of<br />

3 stakeholders that were aware of this provision noted they were satisfied with it). During the<br />

interviews, MS have not indicated that they will further use this possibility in the future, and no<br />

further comments have been provided by stakeholders.<br />

3.4.7 Functioning of checks at the place of <strong>final</strong> destination<br />

Import controls are mainly done at point of entry PoE 115 , but under certain conditions outlined in<br />

Commission Directive 2004/103/EC, identity and plant health checks (but not documentary<br />

checks) can be carried out at the point of destination (PoD). The system is more fully described<br />

in Annex 1 (Theme 2).<br />

For checks to be carried out at the place of destination, the agreement of the plant health<br />

authorities responsible both for the PoE and the PoD is necessary; the plant health authorities<br />

must have previously approved an importer for this purpose on the basis of certain guarantees;<br />

115 The concept of point of entry (PoE)is different from the Border Inspection Posts (BIPs). MS did not want to<br />

follow the BIP approach in plant health due to the extensive volume and complex nature of trade flows in plants and<br />

plant products (large number of consignments; many product groups; complex trading flows), leading to difficulties<br />

in implementing an efficient logistics system. Therefore, minimum criteria for import controls at PoE were<br />

introduced to gain in flexibility. In the case of a PoE, it is up to MS to decide how/where they will do phytosanitary<br />

checks. The PoE where phytosanitary controls are to be carried out could be in a customs area inside the country or<br />

at the border. BIPs are under the territorial authority of customs, at the border only. According to Directive<br />

2000/29/EC, a point of entry (PoE) shall be considered to mean: The place where plants, plant products or other<br />

objects are brought for the first time into the customs territory of the Community: the airport in the case of air<br />

transport, the port in the case of maritime or fluvial transport, the station in the case of railway transport, and the<br />

place of the customs office responsible for the area where the Community inland frontier is crossed, in the case of<br />

any other transport.<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!