2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) Article 1 (4) of Council Directive 2000/29/EC indicates that ―The Member States shall ensure a close, rapid, immediate and effective cooperation between themselves and the Commission in relation to matters covered by this Directive. To this end, each Member State shall establish or designate a single authority, which shall be responsible, at least for the coordination and contact in relation to such matters. The official plant protection organisation set up under the IPPC shall preferably be designated for this purpose”. According to Article 2(1g) the responsible official bodies in a MS shall be either the official plant protection organisation(s) or any State authority established at national and/or regional level, and the responsible official bodies may, under certain conditions, delegate the tasks provided for in the Directive under their authority and supervision to any legal person, whether governed by public or by private law. According to the responses received by the MS CAs to the general survey, the NPPO is considered to be the Single Authority for coordination and contact with the MS and the Commission within the meaning of Article 1(4) in nearly all MS, while in all MS, the MS CAs indicated that the NPPO is considered to be the Responsible Official Body within the meaning of Article 2.1(g) of the Directive. Only in the case of BE and AT, the CAs indicated that the NPPO was not the Single Authority within the meaning of Article 1(4), where respectively the ―Federal Public Service of Public Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment‖ and the ―Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft‖ have been designated for this role. It is also noted that in the case of MS with decentralised governance (e.g. DE, ES, IT) the Single Authority acts as a coordinator of the regions which act as the responsible official bodies for implementation; in this case the federal authority typically carries the tasks of coordination and supervision of the regions, contact with the Commission, other MS and third countries, and data collection at national level. In the case of DE, the NPPO consists of the responsible official bodies of the Federal States and the phytosanitary units of JKI and BMELV (Ministry). When considering the complete implementation of Directive 2000/29/EC, there is a range of tasks and duties foreseen for the Single Authority and the Responsible Official Bodies, some of which can be delegated to other legal bodies under certain conditions (Article 2(1g)). These issues have been explored and are discussed further in section 3.10.1. 2.5 Overview of the CPHR main instruments As it currently stands, the CPHR consists of a series of measures that are in place for the control and eventually the eradication of HOs. The measures relate either to organisms listed in the Directive and/or to non-listed ones. The key measures are explored in depth in five thematic case studies (Themes 1-5). A schematic presentation of how the CPHR is positioned within the wider context of the plant health system, and the detailed CPHR measures currently in place are provided in Figure 3-2 and Table 3-1, respectively. Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 28
Protection of the EU against the harm caused by the introduction and the spread of HOs, while ensuring functioning of internal market R& D WTO SPS Agreements Absence (Peace time) Intro Figure 2-2: CPHR detailed mechanism and context ducti Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Time Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) Entry Establishment Spread Pest status on Eradication Containment Pest management PRAs Source: FCEC Natural Spread Control Trade Protected zones (optional) Measures Categorisatio n of HOs Notification interceptions (Europhyt) of Eradication Demarcated areas, buffer zones, treatment Emergency and control measures Support Measures Measures for Intra- Community movement Requirements TCs for Import controls Notification of findings Notification of outbreaks Requirements for internal movement Precautionary Monitoring Compulsory in PZ and for EM Surveillance Registration of operators →Authorisation and supervision → Plant passport INSPECTIONS Laboratory testing Training of inspectors and laboratory staff Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 29
Page 1 and 2:
I European Commission Directorate G
Page 3 and 4:
Expert Team Agra CEAS Consulting: D
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 25 and 26: 7. Implementation of control and em
Page 49 and 50: Table 1-4: Obligations, tasks, volu
Page 53 and 54: Nb Title of the obligation of the P
Page 61: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 85 and 86: Figure 3-3: Definitions of potentia
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Source: FCEC based on general surve
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
3.5.7 Conclusions on performance of
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
3.8 Export, transit and re-export i
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
PWN Key host plant(s) Estimated pot
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Table 3-20 Estimated potential bene
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3-33: Completed EU standard r
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Table 3-36: Key conclusions from th
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Policy area Evaluation Question (a)
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Source: FCEC, based on results of t
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Eichhornia crassipes (aquatic plant
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Options (most recommended) 6.Emerge
show all

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?