08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Direct costs and losses refer to costs and losses caused directly by the measures imposed by<br />

the plant health authorities. They concern the costs of destruction, the value of the destroyed<br />

plant material (infested or suspected), the cost of pesticide treatment (if applied), the partial<br />

loss of plant material value due to pesticide treatment (e.g. in case of pesticide treatment of<br />

tomato against Bemisia tabaci , reduced value of the product which is not pesticide-free), cost<br />

of disinfection and losses associated to business interruption.<br />

An example of losses associated to business interruption refers to the ‗aubergine‘ test, applied<br />

in case the PCR test for brown rot or ring rot on potatoes reveals positive. The PCR test gives<br />

results in one day whereas the ‗aubergine‘ test (which has to be carried out to ascertain that<br />

the result was not a false positive) takes up to 7 weeks to give a result. In the meanwhile, the<br />

production has to be blocked under the National Protection Authority. This generally causes a<br />

lot of losses and commercial problems because at the time the production is released, the<br />

production cannot be sold or the value has decreased.<br />

Direct losses generally also include price risks, i.e. partial loss in plant material value due to<br />

price decrease on markets caused by HO outbreaks and/or higher replacement costs.<br />

Indirect losses, also referred to in literature as consequential losses, are the losses indirectly<br />

accrued to related industries that also experience effects from an HO outbreak, e.g. traders,<br />

processing industries, auction markets, and possibly tourism industries.<br />

For instance, the potato chain is composed of growers (of potato and seed potato), traders<br />

(selling and buying potatoes either as fresh products or for processing) and the processors. As<br />

an example, representatives of the potato sector in BE indicated the following indirect losses<br />

associated to the outbreak of potato ring rot on seed potatoes and ware potatoes in BE in<br />

2003: breach of contract delivery, replacement costs of the goods declared contaminated or<br />

probably contaminated, loss of reputation and market, rejection of seed lots by some buyers<br />

because they came from a sorting centre affected by the contamination, breach of contract<br />

production (due to lack of seed potatoes) or contract of storage.<br />

In case of outbreak, the magnitude of the losses depends on the value of the plant materials<br />

(for instance, according to one interviewee, the value of 1kg of tomato seed is estimated<br />

between €140.000 and €200.000). It also depends on the extent to which the material can be<br />

treated against the HO or need to be destroyed.<br />

Although the evaluation has extensively tried to collect data on the actual or potential costs<br />

and losses incurred by private operators in the case of outbreaks, including via the specific<br />

cost survey, this is one area where no data has been provided by stakeholders. Only the<br />

existing studies reviewed for the purposes of the above sections on impacts and benefits<br />

(3.11.2 and Error! Reference source not found., respectively) indicate the potential scale of<br />

ome losses in certain cases. This is therefore an area where further cooperation with<br />

stakeholders is needed. Determining the extent and scale of the costs and losses incurred by<br />

private operators is an important element for considering the feasibility of their potential<br />

coverage by the solidarity regime.<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!