2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) List of Tables Table 1-1: Evaluation steps ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1-2: Stakeholder response to the general survey ........................................................................................... 7 Table 1-3: Selection of MS for field visits and relevance to thematic case studies ................................................ 9 Table 1-4: Obligations, tasks, volumes and assumptions used in the cost analysis .............................................. 15 Table 2-1: Current distribution of responsibilities in the implementation of the CPHR ....................................... 27 Table 2-2: Overview of CPHR objectives and measures (a) ................................................................................. 30 Table 3-1 Correspondence of EQs (ToR) to sections of this Report ..................................................................... 38 Table 3-2: Top 20 HOs most indicated by MS CAs ‗to focus on as a matter of priority‘ ..................................... 67 Table 3-3: Criteria for comparison of RQPs and RNQPs ..................................................................................... 69 Table 3-4: List of obligations for mandatory surveillance in the MS ................................................................... 76 Table 3-5: Overview of reporting of mandatory surveillance results by MS ........................................................ 78 Table 3-6: Overview of reporting of mandatory surveillance for potato diseases ................................................. 79 Table 3-7: Time delays in notification of findings, selected recent examples (2009/10) ...................................... 83 Table 3-8: Key categories of intercepted HOs, as recorded in EUROPHYT (2009) ............................................ 88 Table 3-9: Interceptions with HOs from third countries, by commodity, 2005-2009 ........................................... 89 Table 3-10: MS applying reduced-frequency checks for imports of end products ............................................... 96 Table 3-11: MS using derogations from import requirements or prohibitions ...................................................... 98 Table 3-12: MS implementation of exemptions from certain PP provisions ...................................................... 123 Table 3-13: Number of PZs per MS and evolution since 1992 ........................................................................... 128 Table 3-14: Number of HOs for which PZs exist in the EU ............................................................................... 130 Table 3-15: Effectiveness of emergency and control measures by HO* ............................................................. 141 Table 3-16: Main plant health research projects in FP6 and FP7 ........................................................................ 155 Table 3-17: Organisation of plant health laboratory tasks in the MS .................................................................. 168 Table 3-18: Resources for training on plant health, various MS and years ......................................................... 175 Table 3-19: Implementation of ‗Single Authority‘ and ‗Responsible Official Body‘ concepts in the MS ......... 180 Table 3-20 Estimated potential benefit of current CPHR measures and/or national control measures ............... 207 Table 3-21: Main host plants and susceptible areas for which the CPHR has avoided the introduction/spread of Anoplophora* in 7 MS ........................................................................................................................................ 210 Table 3-22: Main host plants and susceptible areas for which the CPHR has avoided the introduction/spread of Ceratocystis* in 6 MS ......................................................................................................................................... 213 Table 3-23: Main host plants and susceptible areas for which the CPHR has avoided the introduction/spread of Erwinia amylovora in 6 MS ................................................................................................................................ 214 Table 3-24: Main host plants and susceptible areas for which the CPHR has avoided the introduction/spread of Grapevine Flavescence dorée in 5 MS ................................................................................................................ 216 Table 3-25: Main host plants and susceptible areas for which the CPHR has avoided the introduction/spread of ramorum in 5 MS ............................................................................................................................................... 217 Table 3-26: Overall benefits of avoiding or delaying the introduction and spread of any HO in the EU ........... 219 Table 3-27: Average annual administrative and compliance costs for CAs (EU 24) .......................................... 221 Table 3-28: Outbreaks considered in the analysis of eradication costs incurred by CAs over the period 1993-2008 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 224 Table 3-29: Average annual administrative costs for private operators (EU 24) ................................................ 228 Table 3-30: Average annual administrative costs per private operator ............................................................... 228 Table 3-31: CPHR costs before the charging of fees by MS CAs to private operators, EU 24 average per year 231 Table 3-32: CPHR costs, after the charging of fees by MS CAs to private operators, EU 24 average per year . 232 Table 3-33: Completed EU standard reporting sheet on administrative costs ..................................................... 233 Table 3-34: Production and trade of selected commodities, EU and selected TCs, 2007 ................................... 272 Food Chain Evaluation Consortium ix
Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain) Table 3-35: Trade in forest products in the EU and in selected TCs, 2008 ......................................................... 273 Table 3-36: Key conclusions from the comparison of the selected third country plant health regimes .............. 275 Table 3-37: Evaluation of CPHR performance during 1993-2008 – synthesis of findings ................................. 280 Table 3-38: Evaluation of CPHR performance during 1993-2008 – utility and effectiveness of policy measures ............................................................................................................................................................................ 290 Table 4-1: CPHR SWOT analysis ....................................................................................................................... 292 Table 4-2: List of ISPM standards ...................................................................................................................... 298 Table 5-1: Overview of themes for key options .................................................................................................. 305 Table 5-2: Preliminary analysis of options: IAS ................................................................................................. 314 Table 5-3: Examples of IAS under each option and preliminary anticipated impacts ........................................ 318 Table 5-4: Preliminary analysis of options: natural spread ................................................................................. 322 Table 5-5: Preliminary analysis of options: positioning of RNQPs .................................................................... 327 Table 5-6: Preliminary analysis of options: improving prevention at import ..................................................... 334 Table 5-7: Preliminary analysis of options: improving prevention intra-EU ...................................................... 342 Table 5-8: Preliminary analysis of options: emergency action ........................................................................... 347 Table 5-9: Preliminary analysis of options: Plant Passport system ..................................................................... 355 Table 5-10: Preliminary analysis of options: Protected Zones system ................................................................ 360 Table 5-11: Preliminary analysis of options: incentives ..................................................................................... 367 Table 5-12 Community financial contribution in the fields of animal health and plant health, relevant budget items .................................................................................................................................................................... 377 Table 5-13 Budget allocations, animal health and plant health, 2007 - 2009 ..................................................... 377 Table 5-14: Direction of impact on EC financial resources of modifications to the CPHR ................................ 379 Table 6-1: Key recommendations for the future and their contribution to achieving the identified needs and objectives ............................................................................................................................................................ 384 Food Chain Evaluation Consortium x
Page 1 and 2: I European Commission Directorate G
Page 3 and 4: Expert Team Agra CEAS Consulting: D
Page 5 and 6: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 11: Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 25 and 26: 7. Implementation of control and em
Page 49 and 50: Table 1-4: Obligations, tasks, volu
Page 53 and 54: Nb Title of the obligation of the P
Page 63 and 64:
Protection of the EU against the ha
Page 65 and 66:
Evaluation of the Community Plant H
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3-3: Definitions of potentia
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Source: FCEC based on general surve
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
3.5.7 Conclusions on performance of
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
3.8 Export, transit and re-export i
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
PWN Key host plant(s) Estimated pot
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Table 3-20 Estimated potential bene
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3-33: Completed EU standard r
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Table 3-36: Key conclusions from th
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Policy area Evaluation Question (a)
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Source: FCEC, based on results of t
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Eichhornia crassipes (aquatic plant
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Options (most recommended) 6.Emerge
show all

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?