08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

conflicts may develop in future, if the CPHR is not positively acknowledged in the EU-IAS<br />

strategy.<br />

The responsibilities of national bodies with competence for plant health and environmental<br />

policy should be clearly indicated and coordinated, as implementation of the relevant<br />

legislation is often the responsibility of different authorities. Invasive species harmful to<br />

plants (either agricultural or other) should be managed by the phytosanitary authorities.<br />

More generally, policy makers in the environment field consider that an overlap in objectives<br />

exists between the two policies, indeed also with agricultural policy, in that increasing<br />

problems in plant health are – to some extent seen as - an indication of degrading<br />

environmental conditions and agricultural practices that both affect the ability of plants to<br />

resist pathogens and increase the incidence of pathogens per se. Large scale monocultures and<br />

intensive farming methods are in particular considered to be one factor contributing to the<br />

degradation of the environment and biodiversity, increasing plant susceptibility to pests.<br />

Stronger coordination in pursuing objectives and designing measures is therefore needed as a<br />

matter of principle between these policies (e.g. through greater use of crop rotations to act as a<br />

mitigating measure to address both environmental degradation and plant health problems) 244 .<br />

Approximately one fifth (17%) of the EU land is covered by sites protected under Natura<br />

2000 (Source: EC, 2009). To date, Natura 2000 comprises 22,419 Sites of Community<br />

Importance (SCIs) under the Habitats Directive and 5,242 Special Protection Areas (SPAs)<br />

under the Birds Directive (EC, 2009). Forest habitat types designated as Natura 2000 sites<br />

cover over 14 million ha, constituting almost 20% of the whole terrestrial Natura 2000<br />

network 245 .<br />

The management of potential plant health problems (pest outbreaks) in these areas is subject<br />

to interpretation by the MS under the Subsidiarity principle of Art. 6, which requires the<br />

existence of ―imperative reasons of overriding public interest‖ in order to undertake a plan or<br />

a project in an area in the network of Natura 2000, and this could create potential situations of<br />

incoherence in pursuance of PH vs. conservation targets. In Portugal for example, Natura<br />

2000 network covers 20% of the territory (including the Setubal region, where PWN was<br />

detected for the first time in 1999).<br />

244 The Commission has launched a study on crop rotation (ENV B.1 contract "Environmental impacts of<br />

different crop rotations in the EU" (completion due in autumn 2010). Earlier studies on multi-functionality<br />

aspects of certain crops, including plant health protection, include: KBBE-2009-1-2-01 "Legumes: key<br />

multifunctional legume crops for an energy-efficient and environmentally friendly future European agriculture"<br />

(the subject is quite broad and includes, inter alia, environmental services associated with of legumes (soil<br />

fertility, impact on epidemiology of plant pests and pathogens in crop rotations, biodiversity, etc.).<br />

245 Source: Green Paper On Forest Protection and Information in the EU: Preparing forests for climate change<br />

SEC(2010)163 <strong>final</strong><br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!