08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Case study: Australian Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed (EPPRD)<br />

The most extensively implemented contingency planning programme that includes stakeholders at world level is<br />

the Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed (EPPRD) 293 developed in Australia. The EPPRD is a formal legally<br />

binding agreement between Plant Health Australia, the Australian Government, all state and territory<br />

governments and national plant industry body signatories. It formalises the role of plant industries' participation<br />

in decision making as well as their contribution towards the costs related to Emergency Plant Pests (EPP)<br />

responses. A list of categorized pests (78 high priority pests) are covered under the EPPRD; a mechanism is also<br />

in place to cover EPP not listed but determined by a Categorisation Group to meet the criteria for classification.<br />

It covers the management and funding of responses to Emergency Plant Pest incidents, including the potential<br />

for owner reimbursement costs for growers (only the direct costs incurred by the owner in complying with the<br />

response plan in assisting eradication efforts: therefore loss of crop destroyed, including stored produce, but not<br />

income losses).<br />

In particular, Government and Industry parties share the costs of the Response Plan based on four Emergency<br />

Plant Pest categories. The EPPRD provide that EPP will be categorized based on potential impacts on public<br />

health, environment or amenity values, regional and national economies, trade and market access, and control or<br />

production costs. The four EPP categories determine the cost sharing arrangement between Industry and<br />

Government Parties, as follows:<br />

Category Funding Ratio Summary of category characteristics<br />

Cat.one 100% government Large impact on the environment, human health or amenity flora values and<br />

relatively little impact on commercial crops<br />

Cat.two<br />

Cat.three<br />

Cat.four<br />

80% government<br />

20% industry<br />

50% government<br />

50% industry<br />

20% government<br />

80% industry<br />

Significant impact on amenity flora and/or environmental values and/or<br />

effects on households, or very severe regional and national economic<br />

impacts<br />

Minor adverse impact on public amenities, households or the environment,<br />

and/or moderate trade implications and/or national and regional economic<br />

implications<br />

Primarily affects commercial cropping industries, with minor or no<br />

economic, trade or environmental impacts<br />

Underpinning the EPPRD is PLANTPLAN, the agreed technical response plan used by jurisdictions and<br />

industry in responding to an EPP incident.<br />

It provides nationally consistent guidelines for response procedures under the EPPRD, outlining the phases of an<br />

incursion (investigation, alert, operational and stand down), as well as the key roles and responsibilities of<br />

industry and government during each of these phases. It incorporates best practice in EPP responses is updated<br />

regularly to incorporate new information or address gaps identified by the outcomes of EPP incident reviews.<br />

293 http://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/go/phau/epprd<br />

Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 350

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!