08.11.2014 Views

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report<br />

DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)<br />

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (red palm weevil)<br />

The first damage due to Rhynchophorus ferrugineus was seen in 1993 in Spain. Initial<br />

harmonisation efforts for common control measures between MS started in 1999 but the <strong>final</strong><br />

Commission Decision only appeared in 2007 (2007/365/EC), therefore quite late for<br />

preventing the spread of this HO. Due to the fact that palms were introduced through MS<br />

ports, and that these palms reached Spain through European internal trade, the measures<br />

adopted by Spain regarding the importation of palm from third countries became ineffective.<br />

The emergency measures taken in 2007 imposed compulsory surveillance. When the first<br />

monitoring overview was completed in 2008, the results demonstrated that the pest was<br />

present in all MS on the Mediterranean Sea (ES, IT, EL, CY and PT).<br />

The potential economic, social and environmental consequences associated with the<br />

introduction and spread of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus are very important, mainly because<br />

once introduced, it is very difficult to control or to eradicate it. This pest is difficult to detect<br />

because it firstly produces only internal damages, with no visible symptoms. The main<br />

pathway of the pest has indeed been through movement of latently infested plants for<br />

planting.<br />

The eradication measures are very expensive and in some cases they involve the destruction<br />

of the plant. Due to the high value of palm, economic losses due to destruction are very<br />

important. Additional losses can be associated with the quarantine period imposed by the<br />

emergency measures (i.e. the plants have to stay in quarantine one year in the country of<br />

origin and one year in the receiving country; within the EU, if the palm comes from a<br />

demarcated area, the quarantine period is two years in the MS). Nurseries also have to be<br />

inspected every three months, and this implies costs for the CA and for producers.<br />

In Spain, the production cost of palm plants has increased by €0.35 per year for a small palm<br />

and €3 per year for a big one, due to phytosanitary treatment. The compensation paid by the<br />

state from 1997 to 2009 to cover producers‘ losses amounted to nearly €24.8 million.<br />

Palms are planted for decorative purpose in public and private gardens. In some areas the<br />

palms are of outstanding environmental value. For example, in Elche (Alicante) there is the<br />

biggest palm forest in Europe and it is world heritage by UNESCO.<br />

In Malta, the cost borne by the public private partnership ELC (Environmental Landscaping<br />

Consortium) in relation to preventive treatment of a total of 5,013 palms in public areas (soft<br />

landscaping areas and major arteries) amounted to € 78,829 in 2008.<br />

In Cyprus, the public authorities spent € 35,000 in 2008 for chemical control, the placing of<br />

pheromone traps and a public awareness campaign related to Rhynchophorus ferrugineus.<br />

This HO has had a large impact also in other countries, such as Italy and Greece (although<br />

information was not specifically provided by these countries in the cost survey). In Italy the<br />

HO, first appeared in Toscana in 2004, spread in the following years in several regions<br />

(Lazio, Liguria, Sicilia, Sardegna, Puglia and Campania). In the years 2007-2008, around<br />

FCEC 203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!