2454 final report.pdf - Agra CEAS Consulting

Options
(most recommended)
6.Emergency actions
Early
detection
Early
response
Specific objective: better prevention
Risk
basis
Operational objectives:
Definition of Incentives Clarification 309 Public/political
responsibilities
awareness
Food Chain Evaluation Consortium 385
Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime: Final Report
DG SANCO Evaluation Framework Contract Lot 3 (Food Chain)
Horizon scanning High
Compulsory development of
contingency plans according to
harmonized framework
Speed up process for adoption
and adaptation of both emergency
and control/eradication measures
7.Plant Passport system
Clarify the scope and level of PP
application, in terms of:
a. Plants; b. Marketing stage
Priority
Need for further assessment
High To be analysed whether these
should be general or pest
specific; degree of involvement
of stakeholders
High
Medium Further detailed analysis of
scope required
Harmonise PP document Medium A separate study is
recommended in order to
examine scope for
harmonisation
8. Protected zones
Status quo (with improvements)of
PZs:
a. Improve surveillance targets,
b. Involve stakeholders,
c. Harmonised eradication
programmes,
d. ending status on time
9.Incentives
Extend current scope of
solidarity: Eradication measures
(current scope): a. Extend (within
current scope) to cover loss of
destroyed material
Extend current scope of
solidarity: New measures
Measures for co-financing
consideration may include e.g.
surveillance, contingency
planning, prevention of emerging
risks and emergency actions.
Further recommendations
Medium More detailed analysis needed
of implications of moving to
PFA and possible coexistence
of PZs and PFAs
High Further detailed analysis of
scope required
High Further detailed analysis of
scope required