29.11.2014 Views

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

GSC Sentinel-2 PDGS OCD - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.10.4 X-Band Downlink Conflicts between <strong>Sentinel</strong> Missions<br />

<strong>GSC</strong> <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2 <strong>PDGS</strong> <strong>OCD</strong><br />

Issue 1 Revision 2 (draft) - 25.07.2010<br />

GMES-GSEG-EOPG-TN-09-0008<br />

page 94 of 350<br />

As it has been the case for the TMTC interface to the <strong>Sentinel</strong> spacecrafts in S-Band leading<br />

to the pre-defined allocation described in section 4.3.7.1, potential conflicts among <strong>Sentinel</strong>s<br />

are also anticipated for the share of X-Band resources considering that:<br />

○ The <strong>GSC</strong> aims for maximised common and interoperable usage of ground-segment<br />

resources. This particularly applies to the <strong>Sentinel</strong>s and to the common use of X-Band<br />

ground-stations;<br />

○ X-Band LEO-capable ground-stations are considered a scarce resource considering<br />

the overall number of EO missions in flight, the required locations of ground-stations<br />

and the investments they represent;<br />

○ The data-rates introduced by the <strong>Sentinel</strong> missions and the dual spacecraft approach<br />

for each mission require overall a very large number of X-Band station contacts to<br />

recover the data on-ground;<br />

○ The mitigation of the required X-Band downlink resources via the use of EDRS are at<br />

this stage only considered as a potential future evolution.<br />

In this respect, an on-going analysis is performed by <strong>ESA</strong> and concludes in a preliminary<br />

analysis report [RD-29], that manageable but non-negligible X-Band access conflicts are to<br />

be expected to support the increased volumes brought in by the <strong>Sentinel</strong>s.<br />

The X-Band downlink conflicts across the <strong>Sentinel</strong>s missions can be classified as follows:<br />

<br />

Signal interferences on ground when performing simultaneous X-Band downlinks: due<br />

to the X-Band shared frequencies and different orbit cycles of the <strong>Sentinel</strong>s,<br />

simultaneous X-Band operations can produce seldom RF interferences;<br />

Ground-stations resource conflict: in which the spacecrafts visibility over a groundstation<br />

do not constrain simultaneous RF activities but the available allocated onground<br />

resources (i.e. antennas availability);<br />

The <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2 <strong>PDGS</strong> will hence account for these constraints when planning the mission<br />

data downlinks to CGS and LGS such that:<br />

<strong>Sentinel</strong>-2 X-Band transmission activities during specific periods can be precluded due<br />

to other <strong>Sentinel</strong>s (<strong>Sentinel</strong>-1 and/or <strong>Sentinel</strong>-3) conflicting X-Band activities having<br />

priority during those periods;<br />

Among all X-Band downlink opportunities offered by the CGS network for <strong>Sentinel</strong>-2,<br />

some can be precluded or shortened by configuration due to prioritised access to the<br />

CGS available antennas by other <strong>Sentinel</strong>s;<br />

It is assumed [Assumption-19] that based on the CGS and LGS networks, a conflict-free<br />

coordination among <strong>Sentinel</strong>s will result in a predefined definition of the above constraints<br />

applicable to each <strong>Sentinel</strong> satellite in orbit.<br />

<strong>ESA</strong> UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use<br />

© <strong>ESA</strong><br />

The copyright of this document is the property of <strong>ESA</strong>. It is supplied in confidence and shall not be reproduced, copied or<br />

communicated to any third party without written permission from <strong>ESA</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!