23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

CFD MODELING FOR PNEUMATIC CONVEYING<br />

Arvind Kumar 1 , D.R. Kaushal 2 , Navneet Kumar 3<br />

1 Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>YMCA</strong>UST, Faridabad<br />

2 Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, IIT, Delhi<br />

3 Research Scholar IIT, Delhi<br />

e-mail: arvindeem@yahoo.co.in<br />

Abstract<br />

CFD simulation is used to investigate the pressure drop prediction capabilities <strong>of</strong> CFD techniques for a 90 0 pipe<br />

bend in horizontal plane for an extended range <strong>of</strong> conveying conditions in a pneumatic pipe line system. The<br />

conveyed material was cement with a mean particle size (d 50 ) <strong>of</strong> 25 micron. In Test Rig, the 90 0 bend <strong>of</strong> 52mm<br />

internal diameter and D/d <strong>of</strong> 6 was configured horizontally. The computational grids for the horizontal pipe<br />

bend similar to that used in experiment. There is broad qualitative agreement in trends and flow patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

pneumatic conveying through pipeline system. For the high solids loading ratio the Eulerian solver and transient<br />

analysis and at lower solids loading ratios the mixture model and steady-state analysis were more appropriate.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Pneumatic conveying is widely used in process industries to transport granular materials <strong>of</strong> different types<br />

because <strong>of</strong> its flexibility <strong>of</strong> layout compared with other mechanical conveying methods and environmentally<br />

friendliness. There are three common modes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> material in pneumatically conveying (i) The dilute<br />

phase where all the material is normally in suspension flow (ii) Dense phase plug flow for non-cohesive particles<br />

with high bulk permeability (iii) Dense phase bed flow for materials with suitable aeration and deaeration<br />

characteristics. Several CFD-based models are reported in the literature for the three modes <strong>of</strong> flow, Mason et al<br />

(<strong>19</strong>98) for dilute phase, Tsuji et al (<strong>19</strong>92), Xiang and McGlinchey (<strong>20</strong>04) for dense phase plug flow, Mason and<br />

Levy (<strong>20</strong>01) for dense phase flow.<br />

A CFD simulation is used to investigate the pressure drop prediction capabilities <strong>of</strong> CFD techniques<br />

across a 90 0 bend both in a horizontal plane for an extended range <strong>of</strong> conveying conditions in a pneumatic<br />

conveying system.<br />

Experimental data available in literature used for comparison<br />

The experimental data used in the present study for comparison with CFD predictions are <strong>of</strong><br />

McGlinchey et al (<strong>20</strong>07). The conveyed material was cement with a mean particle size (d 50 ) <strong>of</strong> approximately 25<br />

micron (d 10 = 6.5 micron, d 90 = 72.5 micron, approximately). In Test Rig, the 90 0 bend <strong>of</strong> 52mm internal<br />

diameter and D/d <strong>of</strong> 6 was configured horizontally with single-ended and differential pressure transducers as<br />

shown in Fig. 1 Different conveying conditions were achieved with superficial air velocities at the start <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conveying line<br />

Fig. 1 Bend geometry and pressure measurement locations (A and B) for pneumatic conveying through<br />

horizontal bend.<br />

221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!