23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

ENABLERS OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT: AN ISM<br />

APPROACH<br />

Sarvesh Kumar, Javed Khan, Abid Haleem<br />

Mechanical Engineering Department, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India<br />

e-mail: sarvesh0045@gmail.com<br />

Abstract<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> technology is acquiring a distinctive character and increasingly being recognized as an<br />

activity that complements other managerial functions in providing the necessary inputs to the decision-making<br />

process. Few factors which are helpers in the implementation <strong>of</strong> technology management which are known as<br />

enablers. The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to developed the relationships among the identified TM enablers. Further,<br />

this paper is also helpful to understand mutual influence <strong>of</strong> enablers and identify those enablers which support<br />

other enablers (driving enabler) and also those enablers which are most influenced by other enablers(dependent<br />

enabler ). The interpretive structure modeling (ISM) methodology is used to evolve mutual relationship among<br />

these enablers. TM enablers have been classified, based on their driving power and dependence power.<br />

Keywords:<strong>Technology</strong> Management (TM), Enablers, dependence power, driving power, Interpretive Structural<br />

Modelling (ISM).<br />

1- Introduction<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> management is a process, which includes planning, directing, control and coordination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development and implementation <strong>of</strong> technological capabilities to shape and accomplish the strategic and<br />

operational objectives <strong>of</strong> an organization (Task Force on Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, <strong>19</strong>87). On the other hand,<br />

technology management includes: (1) planning for the development <strong>of</strong> technology capabilities; (2) identifying<br />

key technology and its related fields for development; (3) determining whether ‘to buy’ or ‘to make’, i.e.<br />

whether importation or self-development should be pursued; and (4) establishing institutional mechanisms for<br />

directing and coordinating the development <strong>of</strong> technology capabilities, and the design <strong>of</strong> policy measures for<br />

controls (Wang, <strong>19</strong>93). <strong>Technology</strong> management is the capacity <strong>of</strong> a firm, a group or a society to master the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> the factors that condition technical change with the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving its economic, social<br />

and cultural environment and increasing its wealth quotient.The overall process <strong>of</strong> technology management can<br />

be divided into the following eight phases (Khamba, Singh and Sushil, <strong>20</strong>01):<br />

• Forecasting and Assessment<br />

• Planning and Strategy<br />

• Acquisition and Development<br />

• Transfer<br />

• Adoption and Adaptation<br />

• Diffusion and Substitution<br />

• Utilization<br />

• Phasing – out.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to develop the relationships among the identified enablers using interpretive structural<br />

modeling (ISM) and classify theses enablers depending upon their driving and dependence power. ISM is a well<br />

established methodology for identifying relationships among specific items which define a problem or an<br />

issue(A. Sage,<strong>19</strong>77, J. Warfield.,<strong>20</strong>05). The opinions from group <strong>of</strong> experts are used in developing the<br />

relationship matrix, which was later used in the development <strong>of</strong> the ISM model. These enablers are derived<br />

theoretically from various literature sources, and experts’ discussion (See Tab. 1).<br />

Table 1. <strong>Technology</strong> Management Enablers<br />

Enablers Number Enablers Description References<br />

1 <strong>Technology</strong> recipient characteristic<br />

( Absorptive Capacity , Recipient<br />

Collaborativeness )<br />

Cohen & Levinthal ,<strong>19</strong>90;Hamel,<strong>19</strong>91;Lyles&Salk,<strong>19</strong>96; Mowery et<br />

al., <strong>19</strong>96; Lane & Lubatkin, <strong>19</strong>98; Lane et al., <strong>20</strong>01 ; Gupta &<br />

Govindarajan,<strong>20</strong>00,Minbaeva et al.,<strong>20</strong>03;Minbaeva, <strong>20</strong>07;Pak<br />

&Park,<strong>20</strong>04 ;Yin& Bao,<strong>20</strong>06; Raduan Che Rose, Jegak Uli, Naresh<br />

Kumar, Sazali Abdul Wahab, <strong>20</strong>09; Escribano et al., <strong>20</strong>09;<br />

Keller,<strong>20</strong>02; Madanmohan et al.<strong>20</strong>04; Griffith et al. <strong>20</strong>04; Santangelo,<br />

<strong>20</strong>00; Levinson and Asahi, <strong>19</strong>95; Sushil,<strong>20</strong>01; Child & Faulkner,<br />

801

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!