23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

Table 1: Levels <strong>of</strong> different process parameters<br />

Process<br />

Parameter<br />

Symbol<br />

Used<br />

S.I Units<br />

Range<br />

Peak Current A Amperes 90-230<br />

Pulse On Time B µs 115-130<br />

Pulse Off Time C µs 48-56<br />

Wire Tension D grams 5-10<br />

The En31 Rectangular bar <strong>of</strong> 100mm x <strong>20</strong>mm x 15mm is mounted on Electronic a Sprint Cut Wire EDM<br />

machine tool and the specimens <strong>of</strong> size 15mm x <strong>20</strong> mm x 8 mm are cut.<br />

Fig (2): Cut Specimens<br />

In this phase, four process parameters viz. peak current, pulse on time, pulse <strong>of</strong>f time, and wire tension were<br />

selected as given in table(3) Experiments were conducted according to the test conditions specified by the L 9<br />

Orthogonal Array as described.<br />

Table (3): Response table for Surface Roughness<br />

Expt<br />

Run<br />

(<br />

A<br />

)<br />

P<br />

C<br />

(<br />

B<br />

)<br />

(<br />

C<br />

)<br />

T<br />

o<br />

n<br />

T<br />

o<br />

ff<br />

(<br />

D<br />

)<br />

W<br />

T<br />

R<br />

a<br />

1<br />

R<br />

a<br />

2<br />

T<br />

r<br />

i<br />

a<br />

l<br />

T<br />

r<br />

i<br />

a<br />

l<br />

2<br />

Mea<br />

n <strong>of</strong><br />

Ra 1<br />

&<br />

Ra 2<br />

1 1 1 1 1 1.58 1.54 1.56<br />

2 1 2 2 2 1.76 1.75 1.755<br />

3 1 3 3 3 3.43 3.42 3.425<br />

4 2 1 2 3 1.51 1.51 1.51<br />

5 2 2 3 1 3.69 3.67 3.68<br />

6 2 3 1 2 3.02 3.01 3.015<br />

7 3 1 3 2 4.48 4.41 4.445<br />

8 3 2 1 3 5.00 4.48 4.74<br />

9 3 3 2 1 3.83 3.82 3.825<br />

Avg. <strong>of</strong> Surface<br />

Roughness=3.106<br />

6. Results & Discussions<br />

6.1 Normal probability plot for Surface Roughness<br />

The normal probability plot is a graphical technique for assessing whether or not a data set is approximately<br />

normally distributed. The points on this plot form a nearly linear pattern, which indicates that the normal<br />

distribution is a good model for this data set. The normal probability plot showed the set <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> response<br />

variables are very close to median <strong>of</strong> set <strong>of</strong> values and not deviate from mid value.<br />

Fig: (3) Normal Probability plot for Surface Roughness<br />

4<strong>20</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!