23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

Ammonia<br />

invapor<br />

compression<br />

systems<br />

Carbon dioxide<br />

in vapour<br />

compression<br />

systems<br />

Yes, well tried<br />

and proven Higher Better Yes (chiller only)<br />

technology<br />

Yes<br />

principle)<br />

(in<br />

Porbably<br />

higher<br />

Currently<br />

lower<br />

No<br />

Strict compliance with safety<br />

standards & codes necessary to<br />

minimize toxicity hazards.<br />

More development needed to<br />

overcome poor efficiency.<br />

Might be best suited as a<br />

secondary refrigerant.<br />

2. CONCLUSION<br />

We now have some very good alternatives for the CFCs but still a great improvement is required in this way to<br />

achievethisLooking further down the road, carbon dioxide may someday replace today’s refrigerants. Though<br />

carbon dioxide is a "greenhouse gas" that may contribute to global warming, it is non-toxic, non-flammable,<br />

cheap and abundant. But to work as a refrigerant, carbon dioxide must be run at extremely high pressures - up to<br />

several thousand psi! As long as the gas is safely contained at high pressure, it works pretty well as a refrigerant.<br />

But such high pressures pose a potential danger to technicians who must ultimately work on such systems.<br />

Someday a perfect air conditioner may use no refrigerant whatsoever. Some time back, the Rovac Corporation in<br />

Rockledge, FL, announced it had developed a revolutionary A/C system that required no refrigerant at all, and<br />

used air itself as the working medium. The Rovac system used a "circulator" that was essentially an expander<br />

rather than a compressor. By expanding the volume <strong>of</strong> air, the drop in pressure produced a corresponding drop in<br />

temperature. The system supposedly required 35 to 40% less power than a refrigerant-based A/C system and<br />

provided equivalent cooling. Mitsubishi has licensed rights to the technology and was investigating it further.<br />

That was <strong>20</strong> years ago. We’re still waiting.<br />

Ten years ago, the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, claimed it had developed a refrigeration process<br />

using an acoustic generator. Sound waves were used to create pressure changes that had a chilling effect. No<br />

word as to what ever happened to this technology.<br />

Although there are a lot <strong>of</strong> substitutes for CFCs as refrigerants, scientists continue to research new substitutes,<br />

which are less expensive, less destructive for ozone layer and more practical for industry. (16)<br />

3. REFERENCES<br />

1) Speth, J. G. <strong>20</strong>04. Red Sky at Morning: America and the Crisis <strong>of</strong> the Global Environment New Haven:<br />

Yale <strong>University</strong> Press, pp 95.<br />

2) The Ozone Hole-The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer<br />

3) http://ozone.unep.org/Ratification_status<br />

4) UNEP press release: "South Sudan Joins Montreal Protocol and Commits to Phasing Out Ozone-Damaging<br />

Substances". Thomas Midgley, Jr and Albert L. Heene "Organic Fluorides as Refrigerants " I&EC, <strong>19</strong>37,<br />

22, 542-545.<br />

6) Exemption Information - The Ozone Secretariat Web Site<br />

7) Use <strong>of</strong> ozone depleting substances in laboratories. TemaNord<br />

<strong>20</strong>03:516. http://www.norden.org/pub/ebook/<strong>20</strong>03-516.<br />

8) The Technical and Economic Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Replacing Methyl Bromide in Developing Countries. Friends <strong>of</strong><br />

the Earth, Washington, 173 pp, <strong>19</strong>96<br />

9) Guidance on the DOE Facility Phaseout <strong>of</strong> Ozone-Depleting Substances.<br />

10) <strong>19</strong>95.http://homer.ornl.gov/nuclearsafety/nsea/oepa/guidance/ozone/phaseout.pdf<br />

11) http://www.epa.gov/ozone/geninfo/benefits.html (accessed 03/<strong>19</strong>/<strong>20</strong>03<br />

12) JasenNeese and Steve OravetzReplacing chlor<strong>of</strong>luorocarbon refrigerants U.S. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Forest<br />

13) Service, <strong>Technology</strong> & Development Program: Missoula, Mont., <strong>19</strong>98.<br />

14) Protection <strong>of</strong> the ozone layer, U.S. Environmental protection Agency: Washington, D.C., <strong>19</strong>95<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!