23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

the emissions would not only be zero, but negative, so that not only the emissions, but the absolute amount <strong>of</strong><br />

CO 2 in the atmosphere would be reduced.<br />

3. Energy Fuels by CO2 Sequestration<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> underground storage <strong>of</strong> CO2 and consequent changes in the viscosity <strong>of</strong> fluids in depleting oil<br />

reservoirs can provide additional fuel for energy. The CO2 will mix with the crude and by changing the oil<br />

properties will help flush out remaining reserves making it flow easily. At the surface the gas mixture containing<br />

both CO2 and natural petroleum gas will have to be separated from the oil before it is sent for refining. The<br />

stripped CO2 can be recycled back into the oil fields to extract more oil. CO2 management through this approach<br />

will be a highly challenging task. It will have to be adopted when all the conventional methods <strong>of</strong> enhanced oil<br />

recovery have failed. A CO2-EOR (CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery) project designed to minimize CO2 emissions<br />

back to the atmosphere with appropriate incentives would have an important role in assuring energy security.<br />

Like oilfields, unmineable coal seams can also prove to be potential reservoirs for CO2 storage. On average three<br />

molecules <strong>of</strong> CO2 are absorbed for displacing one molecule <strong>of</strong> methane (CH4). By injecting CO2 in coal seams,<br />

coal bed methane recovery can be enhanced. Three main CO2 capture processes under development for power<br />

generation are as follows[7][10]:<br />

3(a) Pre combustion Capture Systems<br />

It takes the syngas produced from coal gasification and convert it via – a – steam based chemical reaction into<br />

separate streams <strong>of</strong> CO2 and H2. It facilitates the collection and compression <strong>of</strong> CO2 into a supercritical fluid<br />

like form suitable for transportation and geological storage.H2 is being separated from CO2 to be able to be<br />

used for combustion in gas turbines which is primarily done by Pressure Awing Adsorption(PSA) , amine<br />

scrubbing and membrane reactors.<br />

3(b) Post combustion Cycle<br />

It separate CO2 from the flue gases produced by the combustion <strong>of</strong> coal in air.Post combustion CO2 capture<br />

technology based on chemical absorption processes is large scale technology to be deployed for power<br />

generation purpose.<br />

3(c), Oxy – fuel combustion<br />

It involves combustion <strong>of</strong> coal in pur O2 rather than air, to fuel a steam generator.By avoiding N2 into the<br />

combustion cycle , the amount <strong>of</strong> CO2 in the power station exhaust stream is greatly concentrated making it<br />

easier to capture and compress.<br />

Globally, research in CCS has grown by almost 100 per cent in the last five years as compared to previous five<br />

years block in USA. In India, research is still in its infancy. Under the National Programme on CO2<br />

Sequestration (NPCS), research started in DST in <strong>20</strong>06; the following thrust areas are identified as :<br />

• CO2 Sequestration through Micro-algae Bio-fixation<br />

• Carbon Capture Process Development<br />

• Terrestrial Agro-forestry Sequestration Modeling Network<br />

• Policy Development Studies.<br />

Further studies for Cost <strong>of</strong> Electricity(COE)comparisons for different power plants with CCS are stated in<br />

Table-2.<br />

TABLE – 2 : EXPECTED COST OF ELECTRICITY (COE) FOR DIFFERENT POWER PLANTS WITH<br />

CCS in USA[7]<br />

Sl.No. Power Plant Pulverised Coal Natural Gas<br />

Combined Cycle<br />

Integrated Gasification<br />

Combined Cycle<br />

1 COE without CCS ( 43- 52) (31 – 50) ( 41 – 61)<br />

(US $ / MWh)<br />

2 COE with CCS<br />

( US $ / MWh)<br />

(63 – 99) ( 43 – 77) (55 – 91)<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!