23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

Step 1: Model construction through networks<br />

Decision problem should be structured into networks by using appropriate methods or through brainstorming.<br />

Step 2: Pairwise comparison and priority vectors<br />

Decision makers are asked to compare clusters through a series <strong>of</strong> questions for inner and outer dependence to<br />

achieve the goal. The relative importance values are determined on the scale <strong>of</strong> 1-9. Where a score <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

represents the equal importance among the elements and a score <strong>of</strong> 9 represents the extreme importance <strong>of</strong> one<br />

element over the other (Meade & Sarkis , <strong>19</strong>99). A reciprocal value is assigned to the inverse comparison i.e.<br />

b ij =1/b ji . Local priority vectors are derived similar to AHP. This step is done to derive the eigenvectors and to<br />

form a supermatrix.<br />

Step 3: Supermatrix formation<br />

The outcome <strong>of</strong> step 2 is unweighted supermatrix. Supermatrix is actually a partitioned matrix. Its columns<br />

represent priorities derived from the pairwise comparison <strong>of</strong> the elements. As unweighted supermatrix may not<br />

be column stochastic, so as to obtain one, multiply each block with cluster priority obtained in the step 2. This<br />

stochastic matrix is known as weighted supermatrix. To obtain a convergence on the importance <strong>of</strong> weights, the<br />

supermatrix is raised to large powers and the resulted matrix is known as limit matrix. Priorities can be directly<br />

obtained from the limit matrix.<br />

4 . Intensity <strong>of</strong> AMT Implementation Critical Factors- an ANP Approach<br />

To find the intensity <strong>of</strong> critical factors ANP approach has been applied through Superdecision s<strong>of</strong>tware 2.0.8. As<br />

shown in Table 1, there are six clusters having four factors. A questionnaire has been prepared to rate each factor<br />

<strong>of</strong> cluster with respect to the other factors. Experts were asked to give rating <strong>of</strong> the pairwise comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

factors on 1-9 scale. On this basis, Superdecision s<strong>of</strong>tware generated Unweighted, Weighted Supermatrix and<br />

Limit matrix. Priorities <strong>of</strong> the factors can be directly taken from the Limit matrix. The priorities <strong>of</strong> the factors are<br />

shown in Table 2. The top five factors are Management Support, Quality, Computerized Interaction, Level <strong>of</strong><br />

technology Investment and Financial Risk.<br />

Table 2: Intensity <strong>of</strong> Critical Factors based upon ANP<br />

Critical Factors <strong>of</strong> AMT Implementation Normalized Limiting Intensity<br />

(i) Person Responsible 0.49 0.04 7<br />

(ii) Financial Risk 0.271 0.04 5<br />

(iii) Level <strong>of</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Investment 0.273 0.04 4<br />

(iv) Government Policies 0.137 0.02 12<br />

(v) End User 0.17 0.03 10<br />

(vi) Supplier Support 0.08 0.01 24<br />

(vii) Location 0.138 0.01 17<br />

(viii) Feasibility Analysis 0.068 0.01 22<br />

(ix) Size 0.114 0.01 18<br />

(x) Financial Position 0.189 0.02 14<br />

(xi) <strong>Technology</strong> Competent Workers 0.046 0.01 <strong>19</strong><br />

(xii) Computerized Integration 0.286 0.05 3<br />

(xiii) Flexibility 0.041 0.01 <strong>20</strong><br />

(xiv) Quality 0.297 0.05 2<br />

(xv) Delivery Time 0.229 0.01 15<br />

(xvi) Cost 0.103 0.01 21<br />

(xvii) Employees’ Motivation 0.387 0.02 11<br />

(xviii) Management Support 0.34 0.06 1<br />

(xix) Recruitment 0.<strong>19</strong>3 0.01 16<br />

(xx) Employees’ Training 0.087 0.01 23<br />

(xxi) Customers’ Feedback 0.183 0.04 6<br />

(xxii) Production Rate 0.173 0.04 8<br />

(xxiii) Competition 0.162 0.03 9<br />

(xxiv) Quality <strong>of</strong> the Product 0.134 0.02 13<br />

904

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!