23.12.2014 Views

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

OCTOBER 19-20, 2012 - YMCA University of Science & Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Conference on<br />

Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering,<br />

<strong>YMCA</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> & <strong>Technology</strong>, Faridabad, Haryana, Oct <strong>19</strong>-<strong>20</strong>, <strong>20</strong>12<br />

While after pooling the Final Equation in Terms <strong>of</strong> Actual Factors is as follows:<br />

2<br />

R z =-42.16263+0.44524×T on -0.61505×T <strong>of</strong>f -0.15141×SV+0.16<strong>19</strong>5×IP+4.28286×WT+2.91071E-003 ×T <strong>of</strong>f +<br />

9.76875E-004×SV 2 +7.85417E-005×IP 2 -0.018609×WT 2 +3.23512E-003 ×T on ×T <strong>of</strong>f -1.09097E-003×T on ×IP-<br />

0.033365×T on ×WT+1.12232E-003×T <strong>of</strong>f ×SV-7.25893E-004 ×T <strong>of</strong>f ×IP+4.92411E-003×T <strong>of</strong>f ×WT-3.48646E-<br />

003×IP×WT<br />

Table 4 shows the confirmation test at various selected parameters settings at which surface roughness<br />

minimizes.<br />

4.989<br />

W arning ! Factor involved in an interactio<br />

99<br />

Normal % Probability<br />

95<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

50<br />

30<br />

<strong>20</strong><br />

10<br />

5<br />

Response 1<br />

4.38988<br />

3.79075<br />

3.<strong>19</strong>162<br />

1<br />

2.5925<br />

-1.80 -0.83 0.13 1.10 2.07<br />

111.00 112.50 114.00 115.50 117.00<br />

Studentized R esiduals<br />

A: Ton<br />

Figure 1: Normal probability plot <strong>of</strong> residuals for R z<br />

Figure 2(a): Effect <strong>of</strong> pulse-on-time on R z<br />

Table 4: confirmation Test<br />

Sr. No. Ton<br />

T<strong>of</strong>f SV IP WT Pred. Rz<br />

Actual Rz<br />

Desirability<br />

1 111 42.59 50 1<strong>20</strong> 8 2.99875 3.14 0.83<br />

2 111 42.78 50 1<strong>20</strong> 8 2.99894 3.07 0.83<br />

3 111 42.49 50 1<strong>20</strong> 8 2.99896 3.02 0.83<br />

4.989<br />

W arning ! Factor involved in an interaction<br />

4.989<br />

W arning ! Factor involved in an interactio<br />

4.38988<br />

4.38988<br />

Response 1<br />

3.79075<br />

Response 1<br />

3.79075<br />

3.<strong>19</strong>162<br />

3.<strong>19</strong>162<br />

2.5925<br />

2.5925<br />

36.00 39.50 43.00 46.50 50.00<br />

30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00<br />

B: T<strong>of</strong> f<br />

Figure2(c) :Effect <strong>of</strong> servo voltage on R z<br />

C : SV<br />

Figure 2(b):Effect <strong>of</strong> pulse <strong>of</strong>f time on R z<br />

410

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!