09.11.2012 Views

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 A. Matlow and J.M.A. Bohnen<br />

Proposed Solution<br />

Embed a pop-up <strong>in</strong>to computerized surgical preoperative order sets, such that when<br />

the antibiotic is entered, the physician would be rem<strong>in</strong>ded that the drug should be<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istered with<strong>in</strong> 60 m<strong>in</strong> prior to the <strong>in</strong>cision.<br />

Some limitations of CPGs are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 9.1. The CPGs themselves may<br />

be problematic. Alternatively, problems with physician adherence may limit their<br />

applicability. 13 In a survey of pediatricians about their knowledge and practice of<br />

four CPGs (management of the febrile <strong>in</strong>fant, neonatal hyperbilirub<strong>in</strong>emia, otitis<br />

media with effusion, and preventive care), Christakis et al. 14 found that knowledge<br />

of the guidel<strong>in</strong>es ranged from 16–66%, assessment of mean helpfulness scores<br />

(1–10 scale, where 1 = “not at all helpful” and 10 = “extremely helpful”) ranged<br />

from 3.67 to 6.67, and change <strong>in</strong> patient management based on the guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

ranged from 19–36% for the four guidel<strong>in</strong>es. More recent graduation from medical<br />

school and <strong>in</strong>creased helpfulness scores were associated with more guidel<strong>in</strong>erelated<br />

behavior change by providers. Variability <strong>in</strong> actual implementation was<br />

recently further borne out <strong>in</strong> a review of compliance with the AAP’s CPG on<br />

management of first ur<strong>in</strong>ary tract <strong>in</strong>fection (UTI) <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants, <strong>in</strong> which recommendations<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude timely imag<strong>in</strong>g, and adequate antimicrobial prophylaxis. 15 The<br />

authors reviewed Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State’s Medicaid data, on <strong>in</strong>-patients and out-patients<br />

diagnosed with a UTI with<strong>in</strong> the first year of life, and found that overall, only 44%,<br />

39.5%, and 51% of eligible patients received anatomic imag<strong>in</strong>g, imag<strong>in</strong>g for reflux<br />

and antimicrobial prophylaxis where warranted respectively.<br />

In 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services embarked on a large<br />

pay-for-performance pilot project us<strong>in</strong>g the American College of Cardiology/<br />

American Heart Association guidel<strong>in</strong>es for acute myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction. The goal<br />

of pay-for-performance programs is to tie f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>centives to adherence with<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es. 16 However, Walter et al. have recently drawn attention to problems <strong>in</strong><br />

us<strong>in</strong>g adherence to guidel<strong>in</strong>es as a measure of quality of care. 17 Study<strong>in</strong>g compliance<br />

with colorectal cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es, the authors identified the follow<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

limitations to us<strong>in</strong>g adherence rates to guidel<strong>in</strong>e-based performance measures<br />

Table 9.1 Limitations of cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Technical (guidel<strong>in</strong>e-related) limitations Adaptive (physician-related) limitations<br />

Recommendations are wrong Users have limited knowledge<br />

Are open to subjective <strong>in</strong>terpretation Lack awareness of guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Conta<strong>in</strong> outdated content Lack familiarity with guidel<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Recommendations limit freedom of choice Users have implementation limitations<br />

Negatively <strong>in</strong>fluence resource allocation Disagree with recommendations<br />

Do not take patient preferences <strong>in</strong>to account Lack self efficacy<br />

Reduce flexibility for special needs patients Lack outcome efficacy<br />

Recommendations do not reach target audience Resist change (practice <strong>in</strong>ertia)<br />

Recommendations discourage research<br />

Recommendations <strong>in</strong>crease costs of care

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!