09.11.2012 Views

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 Evidence-Based Medic<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>Pediatric</strong>s 135<br />

barriers to access. In one sample of pediatricians, only 33% said they accessed the<br />

Internet at work and the majority (44%) had slow (modem) connections. 6,8,11,12<br />

10.3.3 Understand<strong>in</strong>g Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Information Needs<br />

Primary care physicians’ <strong>in</strong>formation needs have been well documented 7,13–23<br />

<strong>in</strong> adult medic<strong>in</strong>e, but pediatrician’s <strong>in</strong>formation needs have been less well studied.<br />

12, 19, 24, 25 The first primary study of pediatric cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>formation needs <strong>in</strong><br />

2004 26 found that pediatricians articulated needs for clear def<strong>in</strong>itions for medical<br />

conditions, physical f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and laboratory test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation. It also found that<br />

pediatricians may pursue cl<strong>in</strong>ical questions at a higher rate than other physicians. 8,26<br />

Of particular importance to general pediatricians is the need for pharmacology<br />

( especially drug-dos<strong>in</strong>g) and <strong>in</strong>fectious disease <strong>in</strong>formation. 12,25<br />

10.3.4 F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and Us<strong>in</strong>g Evidence Efficiently<br />

To answer many questions, physicians may use convenient resources such as textbooks<br />

(which may be outdated) and colleagues (who may not have appropriate or<br />

current knowledge). 8,12,13,23,25 To use published evidence, a framework for ask<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical questions when search<strong>in</strong>g primary literature has been suggested (PICO), <strong>in</strong><br />

which a question is def<strong>in</strong>ed by:<br />

Patient population<br />

Intervention or exposure<br />

Comparison<br />

Outcome of <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

A pediatric example is: “In 3–5 year olds with recurrent otitis media, does <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />

of pressure-equaliz<strong>in</strong>g tubes decrease the number of <strong>in</strong>fections when compared to<br />

children treated with prophylactic antibiotics?”<br />

It takes time and experience to formulate an effective question and to search the<br />

primary literature. A more time-efficient method is to use abstractions of evidence:<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>ical guidel<strong>in</strong>es, systematic reviews, evidence-l<strong>in</strong>ked textbooks on a topic.<br />

However, unfamiliarity with specific knowledge resources with<strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong> and<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of their accuracy may <strong>in</strong>crease the time needed to f<strong>in</strong>d an appropriate<br />

resource. For example, general pediatricians usually use the AAP Red Book ® as<br />

the authority on pediatric <strong>in</strong>fectious diseases, but may not be as familiar with other<br />

<strong>in</strong>fectious disease texts. While the use of abstracted EBM resources may be more<br />

efficient for cl<strong>in</strong>icians, the costs associated with access (commercial <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

sources) may be prohibitive to small practices that are not affiliated with hospitals<br />

or academic centers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!