09.11.2012 Views

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health (Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

322 M.M. Simonian<br />

and concerns about the reliability of patient use of e-mail. 6,7 In general, physician<br />

resistance to use e-mail with patients has been high, except <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual practice<br />

groups and associations.<br />

Advantages of e-mail over telephone <strong>in</strong>clude its asynchronous nature, which<br />

reduces “phone tag” and can be used as appo<strong>in</strong>tment rem<strong>in</strong>ders (which <strong>in</strong> conjunction<br />

with patient self-schedul<strong>in</strong>g can reduce no show rates) (reference to reduced<br />

no show rates). E-mail also allows options for templates for answers for common<br />

questions that allow readers to “drill-down” to onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>formation libraries<br />

(via embedded hyperl<strong>in</strong>ks). 8 Some EMR vendors are explor<strong>in</strong>g ways to coord<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

e-mail messages with cl<strong>in</strong>ical content such as lab tests and consultation requests<br />

and <strong>in</strong>tegrated patient <strong>in</strong>formation services (i.e., personal health records) through<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e practice portals. 9<br />

One concern <strong>in</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g patient care ICT is its conformance to the <strong>Health</strong><br />

Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rules with regard<br />

to security and management of protected health <strong>in</strong>formation (PHI). Physician<br />

groups and IT vendors have collaborated to develop Web and e-mail techno logies<br />

and standards that conform to HIPAA, and the AAP has recently updated its<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es on the use of e-mail with patients. 10,11<br />

An onl<strong>in</strong>e modality specifically developed to address these concerns is secure<br />

messag<strong>in</strong>g, an onl<strong>in</strong>e system for register<strong>in</strong>g and track<strong>in</strong>g all electronic communications<br />

between patient and provider for documentation and reimbursement 12 through<br />

secure Web technology that meets HIPAA requirements. Secure messag<strong>in</strong>g allows<br />

(and restricts) view<strong>in</strong>g of an onl<strong>in</strong>e communication to a specific sender and receiver<br />

of a message, a security restriction that is not possible with traditional e-mail.<br />

Secure messag<strong>in</strong>g limits access to a message to its sender and <strong>in</strong>tended receiver by<br />

encryption (encod<strong>in</strong>g or scrambl<strong>in</strong>g a message so that it cannot be read by others)<br />

and decryption (decod<strong>in</strong>g or restor<strong>in</strong>g a message for read<strong>in</strong>g). Secure messag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conforms to HIPAA standards for privacy and security and may be used by patients<br />

to schedule appo<strong>in</strong>tments, to request prescription refills and/or to ask questions to<br />

and receive answers from their providers.<br />

In adopt<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g secure messag<strong>in</strong>g (or any form of ICT for patient<br />

communication), pediatricians (and other health care providers) must ensure that:<br />

(1) the recipient of an electronic message has a legitimate right to access the conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, (2) the message is transmitted only to the <strong>in</strong>tended recipient,<br />

and (3) the <strong>in</strong>formation is accurately transmitted and received.<br />

Despite the availability of tools and guidel<strong>in</strong>es to circumnavigate the medico-legal<br />

aspects of its use and the recommendations of satisfied physician and patient users,<br />

there has not been enough <strong>in</strong>centive to make patient–provider e-mail a widespread<br />

practice. Currently, only a limited number of <strong>in</strong>surers reimburse e-mail consultations.<br />

In situations where non-compensation is less of a barrier (such as salaried<br />

cl<strong>in</strong>icians or fee-for-service reimbursement), positive return on <strong>in</strong>vestment (ROI)<br />

and improved quality of care have been noted by those hold<strong>in</strong>g responsibility for<br />

the costs of care. The federal government’s recognition of the great amount of work<br />

done outside the office has generated efforts to outl<strong>in</strong>e recommendations for payment<br />

mechanisms for such services as e-mail consultation and communication. 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!