City College of San Francisco - California Competes

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STANDARD III.B Downtown • Replacement of entire fire alarm system • Renovation/upgrade of existing HVAC system • Replacement of elevator controls (completed) • Remodel of ground floor (completed) • Remodel of second floor library (completed) • Upgrade of restrooms throughout the building (handicapped accessible) Alemany • Addition of new elevator (handicapped accessible) • Remodel of ground floor entrances and central hallway (handicapped accessible) • Renovation of building, including entire mechanical and electrical systems Gough Street (District Offices) • Renovation of restrooms on the main floor • Replacement of desks, partitions and other equipment at work stations in the Human Resources’ and Controller’s Offices Evans • Purchased by the District in 2000 and remodeled in 2002 to bring the facility into compliance with California State Architect standards (Field Act), including seismic work, new roofing and new HVAC units Mission • Design and construction of new campus, representing the District’s intent of providing facilities throughout San Francisco neighborhoods Chinatown/North Beach • Design of new campus to replace a rented facility so classes now scattered throughout a variety of facilities can be housed together in the new building Southeast, Castro/Valencia, Fort Mason, Airport • Renovation and upgrades were undertaken at each of these locations to improve educational access The College uses its Shared Governance process to review maintenance needs. Shared Governance groups involved with maintenance issues include: the College Small Projects Group, which meets monthly; Building User Groups, which meet as building issues arise; the Health and Safety Committee; and the Planning and Budget Council. [Ref. 5] In addition, the Disabled Students Programs and Services Department ensures that the facilities needs of students with disabilities are addressed. Many of the College’s buildings are old and while they were code compliant when constructed, they require substantial reconstruction in order to meet current code and provide access for disabled students. The College has been taking steps to improve accessibility, replacing/ installing automatic doors and ramps; installing elevators in Science Hall (Ocean Avenue Campus), Alemany Campus, and John Adams Campus; and renovating restroom facilities. Accessibility is taken into account in all new construction projects. III.B.2. To assure the feasibility and effectiveness of physical resources in supporting institutional programs and services, the institution plans and evaluates its facilities and equipment on a regular basis, taking utilization and other relevant data into account. III.B.2.a. Long range capital plans support institutional goals and reflect projections of the total cost of ownership of new facilities and equipment. III.B.2.b. Physical resource planning is integrated with institutional planning. The institution systematically assesses the effective use of physical resources and uses the results of the evaluation as the basis for improvement. CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO 191
STANDARD III.B In cooperation with the State Chancellor’s Office, the College undertook a major effort to inventory and assess the condition of all of its buildings during fiscal year 2002-03. The result was a comprehensive report on the physical state of all existing facilities (the 3DI District Facility Condition Assessment Report). This report is the basis from which the College submits applications to the state for funding maintenance and renovation projects. The College has begun to undertake maintenance and renovation projects cited in the report. [Ref. 2] The 2003 3DI Report showed that the existing District facilities were in generally poor condition. The overall Facilities Condition Index, or “FCI” was found to be 21.59 percent. An assessment of 10 percent or greater is considered poor and a score of 5 percent or lower is considered good. The report noted that this is to be expected considering that of the 32 buildings assessed, 20 were constructed prior to 1975. As a result of these findings, the District set a higher priority on plans for renovating or replacing facilities in the worst condition. Of the four buildings that exceeded an FCI rating of 50 percent, all are slated for replacement. Other buildings, such as the John Adams Campus main building, with an FCI of 27.95 percent, are in the planning stage for major renovations. While the 2005 bond will provide some of the needed funds, a complete funding strategy is not yet in place for the extensive work that will eventually be needed for the Science Building with an FCI of 48.47 percent and more than $50 million of required renovation work. The 3DI report would suggest that in a ten-year period from 2004 through 2013, the District will need to expend more than $112 million to maintain or replace existing facilities just to maintain the FCI rating of 21.59 percent. The District would need to expend $200 million over this same period to achieve the desired overall District FCI of 5 percent. It is important to note that this assessment and calculation is for District-owned facilities and does not include the currently leased Mission and Chinatown/North Beach Campuses. It can be concluded that significant expenditures beyond the amounts that will be available in the 2005 bond measure need to be allocated to some of the District’s older buildings, such as Science Hall and Alemany Campus, or these facilities will continue to deteriorate. The College has in place a fixed assets inventory as part of its Banner administrative information system. Review of annual equipment needs and decisions concerning equipment purchases are generally made by departments and major cost centers. Where efficiency can be obtained, such as the decision to centralize the purchase, maintenance and monthly photo-copying equipment expenses, the District has moved equipment from department to District management and budgeting. In the past, the College’s efforts to provide for the total cost of ownership, a concept that seeks to measure not just the cost of planning and construction but the cost of operating a facility over its expected lifetime, have been limited. In response, the College established a user’s group for design review and total cost of ownership in the planning for the new Performing Arts Education Center. [Refs. 20, 22, 23] The College is also looking to become more proactive with respect to environmental issues surrounding new construction. In all of its current projects, the College has directed its architectural teams to incorporate conservation of resources in their final designs. Sustainable design, planning, architecture, indoor/outdoor environment, and Leadership in Energy and Building Design (LEED) Green Building standards are addressed in the 2004 Facilities Master Plan approved by the Board. [Refs. 1, 12, 23] Physical resource planning is a fully integrated component of the College’s institutional planning process. [Ref. 21] There are Shared Governance committees that meet at regular intervals throughout the semester to discuss and evaluate facilities needs. There are regular reviews, such as the biannual safety report; six-year cycles of academic department and program reviews that focus on facilities needs; and special reports such as the annual space inventory report and facilities condition report that assess the use of College facilities. [Ref. 4] 192 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO
Page 1 and 2:
City College of San Francisco 2006
Page 3 and 4:
CHANCELLOR'S PREFACE: THE MAKING OF
Page 5 and 6:
Certification of the Institutional
Page 7 and 8:
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Authority
Page 9 and 10:
Financial Accountability Annual fin
Page 11 and 12:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chancellor's Pref
Page 13 and 14:
HISTORY OF CITY COLLEGE As of 2005,
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION | HISTORY The outcome
Page 17 and 18:
ORGANIZATION OF THE INSTITUTION The
Page 19 and 20:
Director Human Resources Clara Star
Page 21 and 22:
Dean Admissions & Records (Credit)
Page 23 and 24:
CITY & COLLEGE DATA I. San Francisc
Page 25 and 26:
INTRODUCTION | CITY & COLLEGE DATA
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
CCSF PRINCIPAL LOCATIONS MAP Identi
Page 65 and 66:
Standard I Susan Lopez Dr. Bruce Sm
Page 67 and 68:
PARTICIPANT LISTS Standard I Susan
Page 69 and 70:
INTRODUCTION | PARTICIPANTS Standar
Page 71 and 72:
INTRODUCTION | PARTICIPANTS Theme 3
Page 73 and 74:
READERS’ GUIDE TO THE CCSF ACCRED
Page 75 and 76:
ABSTRACT OF THE SELF STUDY Standard
Page 77 and 78:
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT development
Page 79 and 80:
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT Development
Page 81 and 82:
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT Standard II
Page 83 and 84:
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT Theme III:
Page 85 and 86:
RESPONSE TO 2000 RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 87 and 88:
2000 RESPONSE Over 70 percent agree
Page 89 and 90:
2000 RESPONSE One of the services c
Page 91 and 92:
2000 RESPONSE 2000 | Standard 3: In
Page 93 and 94:
2000 RESPONSE 2000 | Standard 7: Fa
Page 95 and 96:
2000 RESPONSE 2000 | Standard 10: G
Page 97 and 98:
STANDARD I: Institutional Mission &
Page 99 and 100:
STANDARD I II. Standards I.A & I.B
Page 101 and 102:
STANDARD I objectives. In addition,
Page 103 and 104:
STANDARD I Alemany Campuses offer e
Page 105 and 106:
STANDARD I its effectiveness in mee
Page 107 and 108:
STANDARD I IV. References Ref. 1 Re
Page 109 and 110:
STANDARD II: Student Learning Progr
Page 111 and 112:
STANDARD II.A I. Overview of the St
Page 113 and 114:
STANDARD II.A program develops a se
Page 115 and 116:
STANDARD II.A College Curriculum Co
Page 117 and 118:
STANDARD II.A course content, and i
Page 119 and 120:
STANDARD II.A The Intensive English
Page 121 and 122:
STANDARD II.A Committee is the main
Page 123 and 124:
STANDARD II.A some departments (e.g
Page 125 and 126:
STANDARD II.A Most departments repo
Page 127 and 128:
STANDARD II.A II.A.3.b. A capabilit
Page 129 and 130:
STANDARD II.A Other institution-wid
Page 131 and 132:
STANDARD II.A The Transfer Center p
Page 133 and 134:
STANDARD II.A expounds the principl
Page 135 and 136:
STANDARD II.A provide students with
Page 137 and 138:
STANDARD II.A Ref. 26 Ref. 27 Ref.
Page 139 and 140:
STANDARD II.B I. Overview of the St
Page 141 and 142: STANDARD II.B promotes departmental
Page 143 and 144: STANDARD II.B Many special programs
Page 145 and 146: STANDARD II.B Professional developm
Page 147 and 148: STANDARD II.B Students no longer ne
Page 149 and 150: STANDARD II.B III. Strengths & Area
Page 151 and 152: STANDARD II.B IV. References Ref. 1
Page 153 and 154: STANDARD II.C I. Overview of the St
Page 155 and 156: STANDARD II.C Resources building. C
Page 157 and 158: STANDARD II.C combined with qualita
Page 159 and 160: STANDARD II.C equipment line item t
Page 161 and 162: STANDARD II.C Moreover, annual stud
Page 163 and 164: STANDARD II.C 3. There is significa
Page 165 and 166: STANDARD III Resources
Page 167 and 168: REPORT TAB III.A III.A
Page 169 and 170: STANDARD III.A II. Standard III.A R
Page 171 and 172: STANDARD III.A indicators that are
Page 173 and 174: STANDARD III.A Slurs is included in
Page 175 and 176: STANDARD III.A Management Council m
Page 177 and 178: STANDARD III.A the California Commu
Page 179 and 180: STANDARD III.A III.A.4.c. The insti
Page 181 and 182: STANDARD III.A The Technology Learn
Page 183 and 184: STANDARD III.A III. Strengths & Are
Page 185 and 186: STANDARD III.A IV. References Ref.
Page 187 and 188: REPORT TAB III.B III.B
Page 189 and 190: STANDARD III.B While the 2001 bond
Page 191: STANDARD III.B The College actively
Page 195 and 196: STANDARD III.B III. Strengths & Are
Page 197 and 198: REPORT TAB III.C III.C
Page 199 and 200: STANDARD III.C II. Standard Report
Page 201 and 202: STANDARD III.C the Banner database
Page 203 and 204: STANDARD III.C In addition, the Col
Page 205 and 206: STANDARD III.C IV. References Ref.
Page 207 and 208: STANDARD III.D I. Overview of the S
Page 209 and 210: STANDARD III.D The College’s annu
Page 211 and 212: STANDARD III.D The College is self-
Page 213 and 214: STANDARD III.D All of California’
Page 215 and 216: STANDARD III.D The District receive
Page 217 and 218: STANDARD III.D College’s lead fin
Page 219 and 220: STANDARD III.D the highest level of
Page 221 and 222: STANDARD IV Leadership & Governence
Page 223 and 224: STANDARD IV I. Overview of the Stan
Page 225 and 226: STANDARD IV agreement was brought b
Page 227 and 228: STANDARD IV The College’s communi
Page 229 and 230: STANDARD IV The Board reviews, eval
Page 231 and 232: STANDARD IV or regulation to the co
Page 233 and 234: STANDARD IV The Chancellor establis
Page 235 and 236: STANDARD IV III. Strengths & Areas
Page 237 and 238: STANDARD IV Ref. 27 Ref. 28 CCSF Te
Page 239 and 240: INTRODUCTION TO THE THEME ESSAYS In
Page 241 and 242: THEME TAB I THEME I
Page 243 and 244:
THEME I I. Overview This essay prov
Page 245 and 246:
THEME I College), and refined the M
Page 247 and 248:
THEME I These findings called atten
Page 249 and 250:
THEME I success (analyzing the prog
Page 251 and 252:
THEME I methods for their participa
Page 253 and 254:
THEME I Beyond Instruction: Additio
Page 255 and 256:
THEME I V. Resources Res. 1 Res. 2
Page 257 and 258:
THEME II: Student Learning Outcomes
Page 259 and 260:
THEME II outcomes assessment in the
Page 261 and 262:
THEME II City College of San Franci
Page 263 and 264:
THEME II Over half of the colleges
Page 265 and 266:
THEME II learning outcomes for all
Page 267 and 268:
THEME II The English Department’s
Page 269 and 270:
THEME II The responses to this inve
Page 271 and 272:
THEME II While indirect measures ca
Page 273 and 274:
THEME II “Another potential sourc
Page 275 and 276:
THEME TAB III THEME III
Page 277 and 278:
THEME III I. Overview College dialo
Page 279 and 280:
THEME III Dialogs regarding student
Page 281 and 282:
THEME III • DACUM (Designing A Cu
Page 283 and 284:
THEME III needs of both. As a resul
Page 285 and 286:
THEME III At the Mission Campus, in
Page 287 and 288:
THEME III V. Resources Res. 1 Liste
Page 289 and 290:
THEME IV: Evaluation, Planning, & I
Page 291 and 292:
THEME IV requirements necessary to
Page 293 and 294:
THEME IV The Steering Committee for
Page 295 and 296:
THEME IV Many of the recommendation
Page 297 and 298:
THEME IV appropriate, College funds
Page 299 and 300:
THEME IV Collaboration has allowed
Page 301 and 302:
THEME IV Continuous improvement. Th
Page 303 and 304:
THEME IV Once the problem has been
Page 305 and 306:
THEME TAB V THEME V
Page 307 and 308:
THEME V I. Overview This essay illu
Page 309 and 310:
THEME V The College supports progra
Page 311 and 312:
THEME V Organizational support for
Page 313 and 314:
THEME V Biotechnology Program. Biot
Page 315 and 316:
THEME V Organizational support for
Page 317 and 318:
THEME V Administrative support for
Page 319 and 320:
THEME V The College is committed to
Page 321 and 322:
THEME TAB VI THEME VI
Page 323 and 324:
THEME VI I. Overview Demonstrating
Page 325 and 326:
THEME VI registration), and second,
Page 327 and 328:
THEME VI of California. The service
Page 329 and 330:
THEME VI Evaluation of the Shared G
Page 331 and 332:
THEME VI The College’s weekly new
Page 333 and 334:
THEME VI The College has a clear co
Page 335 and 336:
THEME VI The College Diversity Comm
Page 337 and 338:
THEME VI V. Resources Res. 1 Instit
Page 339 and 340:
MAJOR FINDINGS
Page 341 and 342:
MAJOR FINDINGS Teaching & Learning
Page 343:
MAJOR FINDINGS 12. Expand efforts t
show all

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?