03.01.2015 Views

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THEME II<br />

learning outcomes for all students passing through this course, then the English Department would have<br />

to initiate a comprehensive revision <strong>of</strong> its entire writing and reading sequence. Clearly, the courses that<br />

come before and after English 94 were going to have to be revised based on the changes in this crucial<br />

transitional class that connects basic skills with collegiate and transfer-level writing classes.<br />

Therefore, in Fall 2002, the English Department launched a comprehensive effort to revise all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

courses in the reading and composition sequence. There are eight reading and writing courses below<br />

English 1A. 9 For several <strong>of</strong> these courses, between 30 and 40 sections are <strong>of</strong>fered each semester. Even for a<br />

very large department, this is a daunting task, and everyone involved recognized from the outset that this<br />

would take a number <strong>of</strong> years to complete. Based on the lessons learned from the common exam pilot<br />

projects, the English Department Curriculum Committee charged each <strong>of</strong> the “level workgroups” with<br />

developing specific maps <strong>of</strong> students’ entry characteristics and realistic delineations <strong>of</strong> learning outcomes<br />

that could be effectively accomplished and accurately measured. While there was common agreement<br />

that English 94 required immediate attention, one <strong>of</strong> the challenges the Department faced was the “ripple<br />

effect” that one set <strong>of</strong> outcomes would have on the courses above and below the target class. At the same<br />

time, there was reasonable apprehension among some faculty that this effort to match the skills taught to<br />

the capabilities <strong>of</strong> the students at each level might result in a “dumbing down” <strong>of</strong> the sequence, creating<br />

a gap between the pre-collegiate coursework and the transfer-level classes.<br />

The Department was mindful <strong>of</strong> a lesson <strong>of</strong> the Carnegie retreat: “You start with the test, and work<br />

backwards to what goes on in the classroom.” That is, the process <strong>of</strong> trying to carefully define the outcomes<br />

and conceptualize the assessment <strong>of</strong> those outcomes while simultaneously developing the revised<br />

course outlines provides an interactive dialog that results in improvements in the teaching and learning<br />

process. The leaders <strong>of</strong> these initiatives quickly realized that assessment was going to play a significant<br />

long-term role in both the development <strong>of</strong> these course revisions and the active, ongoing maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the course sequence. However, there still was not broad-based support in the<br />

Department for adopting common assessments across the curriculum. That would take time and evidence<br />

that the common assessments would produce something other than a short-term tool for standardizing<br />

outcomes expectations. The members <strong>of</strong> the department most committed to common assessments also<br />

recognized that assessment would have to be embraced by the faculty working on the courses, not<br />

imposed from the outside by advocates <strong>of</strong> SLOs.<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> this essay, Spring 2005, the English Department is just a little over two years into this<br />

revision process. English 94 has been revised into a new course, English 93, with much more precisely<br />

defined learning outcomes and with a periodic broad-based common assessment <strong>of</strong> those outcomes<br />

written into the course outline <strong>of</strong> record. The discussion <strong>of</strong> incorporating a learning assessment mechanism<br />

into all <strong>of</strong> the Department’s sequential courses has “come out <strong>of</strong> the closet” and is an active part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the discussions at every level <strong>of</strong> the course revision process.<br />

There are currently two additional pilot projects in the English Department using common assessments<br />

as a tool for evaluating instructional effectiveness. The first involves the lowest level composition course,<br />

English 90. Over the last two years, many <strong>of</strong> the English basic skills faculty have been involved in a project<br />

funded in part by the Koret Foundation designed to integrate the teaching <strong>of</strong> reading with writing by<br />

developing a learning community model that involves students registering for team-taught sections <strong>of</strong><br />

English 90 and its companion reading course, English 9. This project is based on institutional research<br />

that demonstrated that students who had taken both classes concurrently were more likely to succeed<br />

in subsequent English courses.<br />

9 Four are sequential composition classes; two are developmental reading courses that some students must complete prior<br />

to entering the lowest level writing class; two are independent reading classes that students may elect to take based on<br />

placement results.<br />

268 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!