03.01.2015 Views

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT<br />

improvement. While the District has adopted<br />

and publishes policies and procedures on<br />

academic freedom and honesty, the Faculty<br />

Handbook should be revised to include information<br />

regarding academic freedom and<br />

theguidelines for course syllabi should include<br />

specific expectations for academic honesty and<br />

the sanctions for violation <strong>of</strong> the academic<br />

honesty policy.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> has developed several recent initiatives<br />

related to student learning outcomes<br />

including the addition <strong>of</strong> student learning outcomes<br />

statements for some departments in the<br />

2005-06 <strong>College</strong> Catalog. Institutional dialog<br />

has occurred among many Shared Governance<br />

bodies regarding the student learning outcome<br />

paradigm. However, support from the institution’s<br />

leadership, significant training and<br />

resources, and additional institutional discussion<br />

regarding all aspects <strong>of</strong> this paradigm will be<br />

essential if a paradigm shift is to occur. Since the<br />

last accreditation review, the <strong>College</strong> has raised<br />

both the Mathematics and English graduation<br />

requirements. In addition, the <strong>College</strong> has<br />

adopted a Transfer Associate Degree designed to<br />

promote degree completion by students transferring<br />

to the <strong>California</strong> State University system.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> has engaged in a number <strong>of</strong> successful<br />

efforts to address student learning styles,<br />

although the dissemination <strong>of</strong> information<br />

about these efforts needs improvement to ensure<br />

as many faculty and students as possible can<br />

benefit from these initiatives. The <strong>College</strong>’s vocational<br />

programs have historically used student<br />

learning outcomes assessment in many programs,<br />

collaborate with advisory committees in<br />

the development and revision <strong>of</strong> curricula, and<br />

have a strong record <strong>of</strong> successfully preparing<br />

students for employment. However, the <strong>College</strong><br />

needs to improve the tracking <strong>of</strong> vocational students<br />

once they leave the institution in order to<br />

ensure the curriculum reflects the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

labor market.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> has a well-articulated procedure for<br />

academic Program Review. Yet the Standard II.A<br />

Committee found that the completion rates for<br />

programs scheduled for review were just over 70<br />

percent for the period between 1999 and 2005.<br />

In addition, there is no systematic process for<br />

the review and revision <strong>of</strong> curricula when programs<br />

go through Program Review. The <strong>College</strong><br />

needs to improve the completion rates and the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its Program Review procedures<br />

by clearly defining and disseminating the goals,<br />

expectations, and benefits for Program Review.<br />

A process for institutional follow-up should be<br />

instituted to ensure that action plans are implemented.<br />

The Program Review procedures should<br />

include a systematic review <strong>of</strong> the curricula to<br />

assess the quality and currency <strong>of</strong> the course<br />

outlines and the programs that support those<br />

courses. The development <strong>of</strong> the Decision<br />

Support System has had a significant positive<br />

impact on the use <strong>of</strong> data in short- and longterm<br />

decision making at all levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />

institution.<br />

Standard II.B: Student Support Services<br />

Since the last accreditation review in 2000, the<br />

Student Development Division has undergone<br />

significant change. First and foremost, the<br />

Division was defined as an organizational unit<br />

and provided with leadership in the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Vice Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Student Development; this<br />

initiative resulted in the collaborative identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> a common mandate and the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Division’s first Educational Plan describing<br />

a three-year program <strong>of</strong> development. Second,<br />

a comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> the unit resulted in<br />

a significant restructuring with particular attention<br />

to the area <strong>of</strong> student support services, an<br />

undertaking that provided the opportunity for<br />

increased leadership and collaboration, as well<br />

as enhanced innovation, and led to improved<br />

access and service delivery. Third, the Division<br />

collaborated on the development and implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> its first Technology Plan, addressing<br />

eight critical priorities ranging from improvements<br />

in Banner to the development <strong>of</strong> an<br />

electronic educational plan linked with degree<br />

audit and web-based admissions and registration.<br />

Fourth, the Division embarked on the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development program, resulting in the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the student learning outcomes<br />

initiative as well as improved training and<br />

development at the departmental and divisional<br />

levels focusing, in particular, on Student Support<br />

Services. Lastly, the Division participated in the<br />

72 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!