City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT<br />
improvement. While the District has adopted<br />
and publishes policies and procedures on<br />
academic freedom and honesty, the Faculty<br />
Handbook should be revised to include information<br />
regarding academic freedom and<br />
theguidelines for course syllabi should include<br />
specific expectations for academic honesty and<br />
the sanctions for violation <strong>of</strong> the academic<br />
honesty policy.<br />
The <strong>College</strong> has developed several recent initiatives<br />
related to student learning outcomes<br />
including the addition <strong>of</strong> student learning outcomes<br />
statements for some departments in the<br />
2005-06 <strong>College</strong> Catalog. Institutional dialog<br />
has occurred among many Shared Governance<br />
bodies regarding the student learning outcome<br />
paradigm. However, support from the institution’s<br />
leadership, significant training and<br />
resources, and additional institutional discussion<br />
regarding all aspects <strong>of</strong> this paradigm will be<br />
essential if a paradigm shift is to occur. Since the<br />
last accreditation review, the <strong>College</strong> has raised<br />
both the Mathematics and English graduation<br />
requirements. In addition, the <strong>College</strong> has<br />
adopted a Transfer Associate Degree designed to<br />
promote degree completion by students transferring<br />
to the <strong>California</strong> State University system.<br />
The <strong>College</strong> has engaged in a number <strong>of</strong> successful<br />
efforts to address student learning styles,<br />
although the dissemination <strong>of</strong> information<br />
about these efforts needs improvement to ensure<br />
as many faculty and students as possible can<br />
benefit from these initiatives. The <strong>College</strong>’s vocational<br />
programs have historically used student<br />
learning outcomes assessment in many programs,<br />
collaborate with advisory committees in<br />
the development and revision <strong>of</strong> curricula, and<br />
have a strong record <strong>of</strong> successfully preparing<br />
students for employment. However, the <strong>College</strong><br />
needs to improve the tracking <strong>of</strong> vocational students<br />
once they leave the institution in order to<br />
ensure the curriculum reflects the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
labor market.<br />
The <strong>College</strong> has a well-articulated procedure for<br />
academic Program Review. Yet the Standard II.A<br />
Committee found that the completion rates for<br />
programs scheduled for review were just over 70<br />
percent for the period between 1999 and 2005.<br />
In addition, there is no systematic process for<br />
the review and revision <strong>of</strong> curricula when programs<br />
go through Program Review. The <strong>College</strong><br />
needs to improve the completion rates and the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its Program Review procedures<br />
by clearly defining and disseminating the goals,<br />
expectations, and benefits for Program Review.<br />
A process for institutional follow-up should be<br />
instituted to ensure that action plans are implemented.<br />
The Program Review procedures should<br />
include a systematic review <strong>of</strong> the curricula to<br />
assess the quality and currency <strong>of</strong> the course<br />
outlines and the programs that support those<br />
courses. The development <strong>of</strong> the Decision<br />
Support System has had a significant positive<br />
impact on the use <strong>of</strong> data in short- and longterm<br />
decision making at all levels <strong>of</strong> the<br />
institution.<br />
Standard II.B: Student Support Services<br />
Since the last accreditation review in 2000, the<br />
Student Development Division has undergone<br />
significant change. First and foremost, the<br />
Division was defined as an organizational unit<br />
and provided with leadership in the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Vice Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Student Development; this<br />
initiative resulted in the collaborative identification<br />
<strong>of</strong> a common mandate and the creation <strong>of</strong><br />
the Division’s first Educational Plan describing<br />
a three-year program <strong>of</strong> development. Second,<br />
a comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> the unit resulted in<br />
a significant restructuring with particular attention<br />
to the area <strong>of</strong> student support services, an<br />
undertaking that provided the opportunity for<br />
increased leadership and collaboration, as well<br />
as enhanced innovation, and led to improved<br />
access and service delivery. Third, the Division<br />
collaborated on the development and implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> its first Technology Plan, addressing<br />
eight critical priorities ranging from improvements<br />
in Banner to the development <strong>of</strong> an<br />
electronic educational plan linked with degree<br />
audit and web-based admissions and registration.<br />
Fourth, the Division embarked on the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
development program, resulting in the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the student learning outcomes<br />
initiative as well as improved training and<br />
development at the departmental and divisional<br />
levels focusing, in particular, on Student Support<br />
Services. Lastly, the Division participated in the<br />
72 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO