City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION | ABSTRACT<br />
Theme III: <strong>College</strong> Dialog Promotes<br />
Institutional Improvements<br />
<strong>College</strong> dialogs at CCSF are many and occur at<br />
all levels <strong>of</strong> the organization and among all<br />
<strong>College</strong> constituencies. Meetings and discussions<br />
about institutional issues are pervasive, and the<br />
dialogs that occur are critical to institutional<br />
growth and change and address many sections<br />
<strong>of</strong> the WASC standards. The institutional context<br />
described within the Theme III essay includes a<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong>’s Shared Governance<br />
System and brief descriptions <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong><br />
dialogs organized around four critical areas:<br />
(1) planning; (2) diversity and equity; (3) student<br />
success; and (4) teaching and learning. In reality<br />
there is <strong>of</strong>ten overlap between and among the<br />
dialogs that advance the programs and activities<br />
reflected by these broad areas. The essay then<br />
provides fuller depictions <strong>of</strong> four representative<br />
and important case studies <strong>of</strong> dialogs originating<br />
from four different sources: students, faculty,<br />
administration, and campus/program sites.<br />
The essay closes with suggestions for improving<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> dialog across the District.<br />
Theme IV: Evaluation, Planning,<br />
& Improvement<br />
<strong>City</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>San</strong> <strong>Francisco</strong> has a cyclical planning,<br />
evaluation, and improvement process that<br />
increasingly focuses on student progress,<br />
achievement, and success. The Theme IV essay<br />
examines selected cases at CCSF, widely ranging<br />
from a re-engineering study <strong>of</strong> Admissions and<br />
Records and an Architecture Department<br />
Program Review, to an evaluation <strong>of</strong> noncredit<br />
ESL promotion testing and a re-organization <strong>of</strong><br />
Financial Aid. These cases vary greatly in scope<br />
and focus, but each in its own way provides<br />
insight into the principal parts <strong>of</strong> the planning<br />
cycle and demonstrates how our system provides<br />
the climate, the expectation, and the structure<br />
for continuous improvement through both<br />
periodic and non-periodic means. First, the<br />
essay examines the institutional context; then,<br />
through review <strong>of</strong> selected cases, demonstrates<br />
that our planning and budgeting system is flexible,<br />
well-organized, and even nimble. It will be<br />
clear that the primary focus <strong>of</strong> the system is<br />
supporting the improvement <strong>of</strong> teaching and<br />
learning.<br />
Theme V: Organization<br />
The Theme V essay illustrates the organizational<br />
support the <strong>College</strong> provides to support student<br />
learning through two case studies, one <strong>of</strong> a<br />
department, Biological Sciences, and the other<br />
<strong>of</strong> a program, Biotechnology. Predictably, some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the organizational structure issues reported<br />
in these case studies may be unique to<br />
Biotechnology or Biological Sciences; however,<br />
the conclusion focuses on <strong>College</strong>-wide issues<br />
raised in these case studies related to staff,<br />
resources, and organizational structure.<br />
The Biological Sciences Department case study<br />
gives a picture <strong>of</strong> a typical academic department.<br />
Several Biological Science courses can be used<br />
to satisfy the CCSF graduation requirement in<br />
Natural Sciences and can also be used to meet<br />
general education requirements for the<br />
<strong>California</strong> State University (CSU) and University<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> (UC) systems. The department<br />
chair, three faculty members, and the Dean<br />
<strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Science and Mathematics<br />
were interviewed to gather information for<br />
this case study.<br />
The Biotechnology Program was chosen because<br />
it meets the educational and training needs <strong>of</strong><br />
students related to workforce, economic, and<br />
community development (CCSF Strategic<br />
Priority 3). This program illustrates how the<br />
<strong>College</strong> supports student learning through both<br />
its noncredit and credit programs. The <strong>College</strong><br />
has successfully sought grant funding to support<br />
the program, and it has received regional, state,<br />
and national recognition. This program is a good<br />
example <strong>of</strong> the way the <strong>College</strong> develops community<br />
and industry partnerships to support<br />
programs that meet student needs. Interviews<br />
with the program coordinators <strong>of</strong> the biotech<br />
certificate programs, the coordinator <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Bridge to Biotech program, the director <strong>of</strong><br />
Bio-Link, the coordinator <strong>of</strong> the new equipment<br />
clearinghouse, and the Dean <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong><br />
Science and Mathematics provided the foundation<br />
for this case study.<br />
CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO<br />
79