City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THEME III<br />
Another example is the English as a Second Language (ESL) and Transitional Studies Departments’<br />
Reflective Teaching Project (RTP), initiated in response to requests by ESL faculty for a venue to discuss<br />
classroom issues in a structured and supportive environment. RTP is based on the reflective cycle <strong>of</strong><br />
learning documented by John Dewey. Commensurate with the goals <strong>of</strong> student engagement, reflective<br />
teaching promotes critical thinking skills and encourages instructors to find ways to involve students<br />
as active participants in their own learning. This grant-funded project has allowed ESL and Transitional<br />
Studies instructors to meet once a month at several campuses to discuss a specific classroom issue <strong>of</strong><br />
concern to them. The participant-led agenda and confidential nature <strong>of</strong> the dialogs have encouraged<br />
instructors to raise issues freely among their peers in a structured and prescribed manner, focusing on<br />
finding solutions to staff-development concerns. The project has been very successful and in response<br />
to increased faculty interest, plans are underway to find ways to expand it.<br />
III. Case Studies<br />
These examples <strong>of</strong> dialogs were selected for the quality <strong>of</strong> involvement by a larger number and/or variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> participants, use <strong>of</strong> information/data, and the significance <strong>of</strong> the resulting and ongoing effects on<br />
institutional improvement and responsiveness to student needs. They reflect the voices <strong>of</strong> the initiating<br />
source <strong>of</strong> the dialog:<br />
• from faculty—Design Collaborative<br />
• from administration—Enhanced Self-Study (ESS)<br />
• from students—service learning (SL) and the student election process<br />
• from campus/program sites—campus/site advisory committees<br />
and community-based organizations (CBOs)<br />
Design Collaborative—Faculty-Initiated Dialog. The Design Collaborative is an interdisciplinary initiative<br />
that to date has involved discussions and curriculum planning among faculty from the departments<br />
and programs <strong>of</strong> Architecture, Art, Graphic Communications, Multimedia Studies, and Photography, along<br />
with the deans <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Science and Mathematics and Liberal Arts, and administrators from the<br />
Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants. There is no formal administrative structure; it is a true collaborative<br />
effort among department chairs, instructors, and deans, whose common interest and dedication to<br />
their pr<strong>of</strong>essions and to student learning have created the momentum and outcomes. Right from the<br />
start the chairs and deans encouraged this innovative collaboration. The initiative has moved through<br />
many stages, all involving dialog and consensus-building, to identify ways to better serve students,<br />
discuss challenges, and find solutions.<br />
Discussion started in Spring 2000, when the chairpersons <strong>of</strong> Photography, Graphic Communications, Art,<br />
and Architecture began to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> teaching courses collaboratively. The Dean <strong>of</strong> Science<br />
and Mathematics supported the idea and had a conversation with Chancellor Day about how a collaboration<br />
might fit the then-developing animation industry. The Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs called<br />
a meeting <strong>of</strong> the founding departments and the Dean <strong>of</strong> Liberal Arts during which the project goals and<br />
plans were discussed and clarified, resulting in a VTEA grant proposal submitted in March 2002. The<br />
following academic year (2002-03), more dialog, planning, and review <strong>of</strong> data occurred. Those activities<br />
that involved significant discussions included:<br />
284 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO