03.01.2015 Views

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THEME III<br />

Another example is the English as a Second Language (ESL) and Transitional Studies Departments’<br />

Reflective Teaching Project (RTP), initiated in response to requests by ESL faculty for a venue to discuss<br />

classroom issues in a structured and supportive environment. RTP is based on the reflective cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

learning documented by John Dewey. Commensurate with the goals <strong>of</strong> student engagement, reflective<br />

teaching promotes critical thinking skills and encourages instructors to find ways to involve students<br />

as active participants in their own learning. This grant-funded project has allowed ESL and Transitional<br />

Studies instructors to meet once a month at several campuses to discuss a specific classroom issue <strong>of</strong><br />

concern to them. The participant-led agenda and confidential nature <strong>of</strong> the dialogs have encouraged<br />

instructors to raise issues freely among their peers in a structured and prescribed manner, focusing on<br />

finding solutions to staff-development concerns. The project has been very successful and in response<br />

to increased faculty interest, plans are underway to find ways to expand it.<br />

III. Case Studies<br />

These examples <strong>of</strong> dialogs were selected for the quality <strong>of</strong> involvement by a larger number and/or variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> participants, use <strong>of</strong> information/data, and the significance <strong>of</strong> the resulting and ongoing effects on<br />

institutional improvement and responsiveness to student needs. They reflect the voices <strong>of</strong> the initiating<br />

source <strong>of</strong> the dialog:<br />

• from faculty—Design Collaborative<br />

• from administration—Enhanced Self-Study (ESS)<br />

• from students—service learning (SL) and the student election process<br />

• from campus/program sites—campus/site advisory committees<br />

and community-based organizations (CBOs)<br />

Design Collaborative—Faculty-Initiated Dialog. The Design Collaborative is an interdisciplinary initiative<br />

that to date has involved discussions and curriculum planning among faculty from the departments<br />

and programs <strong>of</strong> Architecture, Art, Graphic Communications, Multimedia Studies, and Photography, along<br />

with the deans <strong>of</strong> the School <strong>of</strong> Science and Mathematics and Liberal Arts, and administrators from the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants. There is no formal administrative structure; it is a true collaborative<br />

effort among department chairs, instructors, and deans, whose common interest and dedication to<br />

their pr<strong>of</strong>essions and to student learning have created the momentum and outcomes. Right from the<br />

start the chairs and deans encouraged this innovative collaboration. The initiative has moved through<br />

many stages, all involving dialog and consensus-building, to identify ways to better serve students,<br />

discuss challenges, and find solutions.<br />

Discussion started in Spring 2000, when the chairpersons <strong>of</strong> Photography, Graphic Communications, Art,<br />

and Architecture began to explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> teaching courses collaboratively. The Dean <strong>of</strong> Science<br />

and Mathematics supported the idea and had a conversation with Chancellor Day about how a collaboration<br />

might fit the then-developing animation industry. The Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs called<br />

a meeting <strong>of</strong> the founding departments and the Dean <strong>of</strong> Liberal Arts during which the project goals and<br />

plans were discussed and clarified, resulting in a VTEA grant proposal submitted in March 2002. The<br />

following academic year (2002-03), more dialog, planning, and review <strong>of</strong> data occurred. Those activities<br />

that involved significant discussions included:<br />

284 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!