03.01.2015 Views

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THEME V<br />

The Department needs more equipment and space for labs but is not able to meet its needs because<br />

<strong>College</strong> resources are extremely limited. Microbiology, for example, needs a new lab. The current lab<br />

only has enough equipment for 24 students. There are eight sections <strong>of</strong>fered and hundreds <strong>of</strong> students<br />

are turned away each semester. There have been some communication problems with the Purchasing<br />

Department, resulting in equipment being ordered that does not meet the Department needs. There is<br />

some frustration with not being able to get some vendors they prefer on the approved <strong>College</strong> vendor<br />

list. Computers in student labs are getting old and the Department wishes more support were available<br />

from Information Technology Services for maintaining them.<br />

The Department collaborates with SFSU on a National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health grant that has developed Health<br />

Paths for moving students into Biological Sciences, Allied Health, and graduate school programs. CCSF<br />

instructors identify students who are given priority enrollment in Biological Sciences and Allied Health<br />

programs at SFSU. Some CCSF Biological Sciences faculty conduct weekly seminars with their counterparts<br />

at SFSU to discuss a variety <strong>of</strong> issues including counseling and tutoring needs <strong>of</strong> students. CCSF, SFSU, and<br />

UC Berkeley also collaborate on a Bridges Program that is designed to enhance the success <strong>of</strong> students in<br />

the biomedical field. Students participate in a summer research program and receive a small stipend.<br />

Organizational means to evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> programs in producing student learning outcomes,<br />

and to make improvements. The Department was in the middle <strong>of</strong> its Program Review when interviewed<br />

for this essay in Spring 2005. The Department has found the Decision Support System, developed by the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants, easy to use and helpful for finding data for Program Review on<br />

such things as enrollment figures and success rates <strong>of</strong> their students. The Department would like to conduct<br />

the optional faculty and student surveys but would like to modify the survey forms provided by the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants to tailor them for the Department. Unfortunately, due to work<br />

overload and lack <strong>of</strong> extra funding, that Office was unable to provide support for doing this or to provide<br />

Scantron forms for the Department to conduct the surveys in classes rather than online. Fortunately, the<br />

Vice Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Academic Affairs agreed to provide the needed funds to complete their surveys. As<br />

the Department reviews the goals and objectives from their last Program Review, they find that some<br />

identified needs for improvement have been met, such as replacement <strong>of</strong> windows in the Science Building<br />

and the <strong>College</strong>-wide computer roll-out, but that little progress has been made with other needs, such as<br />

increased needs for lab and clerical support, remodeling and painting classrooms, and improved maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> restrooms. Most <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong>ferings have been severely impacted in the past several<br />

years and they hope that this Program Review will help them make the case for the need for more classes.<br />

The Department representatives expressed some dissatisfaction with the faculty evaluation process. They<br />

feel that instructors do not get sufficient training on how to evaluate their peers and that more pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

development should be provided to train instructors in effective evaluation methods.<br />

The Biological Sciences student success rate has risen from 67.89 percent <strong>of</strong> students passing with a C or<br />

higher in Fall 1998 to 73.32 percent in Fall 2003. The average GPA for students in all Biological Sciences<br />

courses has risen slightly from 2.67 in 1998 to 2.75 in 2003. Although these figures are slightly lower<br />

than the <strong>College</strong>-wide GPA, the Department feels that they have “set the bar high” and are pleased that<br />

the overall success rate for the Department has been higher than the overall <strong>College</strong> success rate. The<br />

Department has asked the Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants for transfer data to help them determine<br />

how well their students do after leaving the <strong>College</strong>. They do not at present see a need to develop<br />

common exams for courses or other means to evaluate student attainment <strong>of</strong> learning outcomes. They<br />

see their increased enrollment as an indication that they are developing a good reputation for <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

a quality program that is drawing students to CCSF. Instructors voiced their desire for students to come<br />

more prepared for biology courses and noted that students are <strong>of</strong>ten deficient in English and math skills.<br />

The Department desires and seeks interaction with the Math, ESL, and English Departments to help<br />

students with scientific terminology and computational skills.<br />

318 CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!