City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
City College of San Francisco - California Competes
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THEME VI<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>. The service provides colleges with regular updates that include legal opinions, questions<br />
from other subscribing colleges, and new and revised policies and procedure samples reflecting new laws<br />
and regulations. Examples <strong>of</strong> recent updates include a revision to policy concerning a district’s political<br />
activity, and the creation <strong>of</strong> new policies regarding intellectual property and the provision <strong>of</strong> voter registration<br />
materials. The question that remains, however, is what process will be established to formally<br />
reflect the updates in CCSF policy manuals, inform affected departments, and implement changes.<br />
Inclusion <strong>of</strong> All <strong>College</strong> Constituencies<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Student Satisfaction. The <strong>College</strong> continually seeks the opinions <strong>of</strong> students and employees<br />
and researches issues concerning the quality <strong>of</strong> our programs, services, and facilities. Research is a<br />
priority at CCSF, and the <strong>College</strong>’s Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants handles the demands with<br />
a high level <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism. Its expertise in research design, sampling methods, data analysis, and<br />
reporting enables the <strong>College</strong> to: (1) conduct comprehensive evaluations on a huge scale, such as student<br />
success or student attitude studies with years <strong>of</strong> aggregated data or (2) conduct rather defined validity studies<br />
investigating, for example, the relationship between two specific variables, such as student success in<br />
a course, given a particular teaching method. The <strong>College</strong> has become information-rich not only because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tremendous output <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> Research, Planning and Grants, but also because <strong>of</strong> the volume<br />
and variety <strong>of</strong> data that the <strong>College</strong> collects, generates, and maintains access to. The 1999 study, “What<br />
Students Think <strong>of</strong> CCSF,” was an analysis <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> three years <strong>of</strong> student satisfaction surveys<br />
administered to 16,811 students by individual instructional departments as part <strong>of</strong> their Program Review<br />
processes. Students were asked to rate elements <strong>of</strong> an instructional department, such as quality <strong>of</strong> instruction,<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> instructors, respect for students, encouragement to express viewpoints, and classroom<br />
facilities. A broad analysis <strong>of</strong> all student responses showed that students were “generally quite positive<br />
about CCSF.” A further analysis <strong>of</strong> responses broken out by student background variables (e.g., age, ethnicity,<br />
sex, educational goal) and institutional variables, which included school affiliation (e.g., Behavioral<br />
Sciences) and student grade outcomes revealed more nuanced information regarding student attitudes.<br />
For example, greater differences in student satisfaction were found among programs within each school<br />
than among the seven schools themselves; rates <strong>of</strong> satisfaction differed by ethnicity; younger students<br />
were more critical in their appraisal <strong>of</strong> programs and <strong>of</strong> encouragement to express viewpoints; students<br />
who self-reported A/B grades gave high ratings regarding instructors’ encouragement to complete educational<br />
goals and to express viewpoints, while students who self-reported D/F grades were more likely to<br />
say that instructors did not keep them informed <strong>of</strong> their progress and complained <strong>of</strong> a general lack <strong>of</strong><br />
communication with instructors. Such candid results have stimulated discussion among faculty about<br />
the important link between student participation and success, and efforts that might be made to reach<br />
out to low-achieving students. Equally informative have been other regular student surveys such as<br />
Students Who Petitioned for Graduation (2000 and 2001), Students Leaving Before Census (2000), and<br />
Student Opinion Survey (2004), which, in addition to eliciting satisfaction ratings <strong>of</strong> services and instruction,<br />
also attempted to assess students’ relationship to the <strong>College</strong>. For example, continuing students<br />
in the 2004 study were asked to rate their “sense <strong>of</strong> belonging at the campus,” the extent to which<br />
“students show respect for one another,” and the extent to which “faculty are supportive <strong>of</strong> students.”<br />
As in previous studies, students responded positively in general, with older students indicating higher<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> satisfaction than younger students, and Asian students indicating slightly lower levels <strong>of</strong> satisfaction<br />
than other ethnicities. The 2000-01 Survey <strong>of</strong> Students Who Petitioned for Graduation and the 2004<br />
Student Opinion Survey cited employment and personal issues as the major problems that have “affected<br />
studies while at CCSF.” While the <strong>College</strong> may not be able to explore remedies to those problems, it can<br />
address other issues that students raised in the “open-ended” section <strong>of</strong> the latter survey, including issues<br />
such as limited course availability, parking, and access to student services.<br />
CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO<br />
333