03.01.2015 Views

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

City College of San Francisco - California Competes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEME III<br />

• DACUM (Designing A CurriculUM) sessions involving seven faculty from five departments<br />

and over 12 representatives from industry, resulting in a summary <strong>of</strong> findings.<br />

• A two-day retreat attended by seven faculty and administrators to review and discuss research findings<br />

that had been provided by a project consultant, and determine implications for course finalization.<br />

The Design Collaborative team has effectively developed and obtained Curriculum Committee approval<br />

for three initial courses since the 2003–04 academic year: Design Fundamentals, Rapid Visualization, and<br />

Color in Design. Faculty members began testing two <strong>of</strong> these courses during the Spring 2004 semester.<br />

The collaboration has involved several faculty who have met to discuss the syllabi and classroom activities.<br />

The Color in Design course debuted in Spring 2005, and a Design History course will be ready for Fall<br />

2005, resources permitting. The next goal is to fully develop the Associate <strong>of</strong> Arts Degree in Design,<br />

which will entail more dialogs for developing the final two courses, Orientation to Design and the Design<br />

Practicum. This project, driven by faculty committed to dialog and finding ways to improve the learning<br />

experience for students, appears to be on its way to success.<br />

Enhanced Self-Study – Institution-Wide Dialog. The Enhanced Self-Study illustrates perhaps the most<br />

intensive, broad-based, informed, and intentional institutional dialog in the <strong>College</strong>’s history. Following<br />

the 2000 WASC Self-Study, the Chancellor proposed that the <strong>College</strong> undertake an Enhanced Self-Study<br />

Project (ESS) to “reach deeply and incisively into the critical areas <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong> where students are served<br />

and success is achieved, to discover what we are doing that works and what is needed, and to recommend<br />

the various vital changes which, taken together, can transform this educational enterprise” (Opening Day<br />

Address, Fall 2000). His proposal was elaborated in the form <strong>of</strong> a handbook and disseminated to various<br />

individuals and groups, including the Academic Senate Executive Council and the Department Chairs<br />

Council for review and comments. After much debate and discussion among the <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the Academic<br />

Senate, some revisions to the proposal were made and the project moved forward.<br />

In Fall 2000, members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong> community began organizing and meeting. From the beginning<br />

the goal was to use the <strong>College</strong> Shared Governance System to ensure the broadest involvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community. The basic structure <strong>of</strong> the ESS rested on five ad hoc committees: Pre-Registration and<br />

Matriculation; Pre-<strong>College</strong> Learning; <strong>College</strong> Level Learning; Enrollment Management Tools; and Student<br />

Outcomes. Orientation sessions were attended by more than 125 faculty, staff, students, and administrators<br />

during the fall semester, and these volunteers joined one <strong>of</strong> the five ad hoc committees. Initial<br />

meetings involved a lot <strong>of</strong> brainstorming and frank discussions about problems and concerns that<br />

committee members believed to be barriers to student learning and success. When a committee finally<br />

drafted a recommendation, the co-chairs brought that recommendation to the Ad Hoc Coordinating<br />

Council (AHCC) for more discussion and acceptance, if appropriate.<br />

The co-chairs <strong>of</strong> the five committees regularly provided progress reports to the AHCC, co-chaired by the<br />

Chancellor and the President <strong>of</strong> the Academic Senate, and composed <strong>of</strong> the co-chairs <strong>of</strong> the committees,<br />

the Vice Chancellors, a Department Chairs Council representative, and an Associated Students representative.<br />

The sessions consisted <strong>of</strong> co-chair updates and presentations <strong>of</strong> recommendations coming out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

committees. After more discussion and questioning from the AHCC, the co-chair(s) took the recommendation(s)<br />

back to their committees for further work before resubmitting them. During this interactive<br />

discussion process with the AHCC, two recommendations were merged, three others were not approved,<br />

and the AHCC discovered that two original recommendations could be readily implemented without<br />

being a part <strong>of</strong> the ESS recommendations.<br />

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!