Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 17 - Location of recycling facilities in the Borough 9.7 The Council changed its recycling and rubbish collection routine in October 2012. Residents in the Borough have their refuse collected fortnightly and their recycling on the alternate fortnights (co-mingled waste). Food waste bins are collected weekly. Residents can be provided with green waste bins and/or bags but this is a chargeable service. Green waste is collected fortnightly. 9.8 In terms of capacity of existing facilities, there are no capacity issues at either the Lyne Lane Community Recycling Centre or at the local recycling facilities in the Borough. Surrey Waste Partnership’s ‘A plan for waste management’ (September 2010) noted at the time of writing of the report, however, that there were insufficient facilities in Surrey to treat all of the collected green waste that was potentially available from the Districts, and there were no facilities which could accept food waste in the County. Local Plan 9.9 It is estimated that over the plan period 2011-2026, that significant new residential units will be provided across the Borough within the general locations shown in Table 4. It is considered reasonable to assume that the increase in residents that will accompany this new development (as well as that generated from growth across the London Fringe area generally) will put extra pressure on the waste management facilities in the Borough and surrounding area. In line with the recommendations of the Surrey Waste Plan therefore, further facilities are likely to be required to support growth. 9.10 Strategic Policy 01 is concerned with Green Belt areas in the Borough. Any waste management facilities proposed in the Green Belt will need to be carefully considered as this policy promotes the strict protection of the Green Belt. This ties in with policy CW6 of the Surrey Waste Management Plan which also states that there will be a presumption against inappropriate waste related development in the Green Belt except Page | 97 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
in very special circumstances. It states that very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development of waste management facilities in the Green Belt will not exist unless the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. It notes that the following may contribute to very special circumstances: Future provision • the lack of suitable non-Green Belt sites • the need to find locations well related to the source of waste arisings; • the characteristics of the site; and • the wider environmental and economic benefits of sustainable waste management, including the need for a range of sites. 9.11 The South East Plan (2009) estimated that total waste production in Surrey will grow from 24.5 million tonnes per annum to nearly 35 million tonnes per annum by 2025. It is considered reasonable to assume that the predicted increase in population in the region over this same period will correlate with an increase in municipal waste (although commercial and industrial waste arisings are likely to be unaffected by population growth). The Surrey Waste Management Plan notes that the average Surrey resident is increasing the amount of waste produced each year. The rate of growth DEFRA expects for household waste generation is expected to be in the region of 1.5% per annum. 9.12 When considering specific developments proposed, there are no known plans to make further improvements to either the Lyne Lane Community Recycling Centre or the local recycling facilities within the Borough over the plan period at the current time. 9.13 A number of applications have however been considered by Surrey County Council at Trumps Farm, Kitsmead Lane, Lyne in the last few years. These applications have allowed for: • the construction and operation of a) an anaerobic digestion facility and b) a wood drying and pelleting facility at the site • the continued use of the land for importation of green waste for shredding and composting in eco-pods and soils for screening for use on the farms in association with an organic farming project and the reconfiguration of the working area including seven storage bays; reduction in the size of bin area; relocation of control room office, car parking area, lagoon and weighbridge, embankment and eco-pods. 9.14 When operational, the anaerobic digester will process up to 48,500tpa of biodegradable organic waste (e.g. food waste) serving primarily the north of Surrey. The site will accept mainly commercial waste from restaurants, supermarkets, hospitals and food manufacturing companies. The wood drying and pelleting facility would process up to 10,000tpa of wood waste from local landscapers and highway maintenance works (Waste Planning, 4th November 2011). 9.15 The Surrey Waste Management Plan policy WD2 also allocates the land adjacent to Trumps Farm, Longcross and Lyne Lane, Chertsey (a former compost site) for most forms of waste management use (excluding thermal treatment). 9.16 In addition, it should be noted that the eco-park at Charlton Lane, Shepperton, although situated outside the Borough, will serve the needs of Spelthorne, Elmbridge and Runnymede for the treatment of mostly residual household waste. Surrey County Council Planning and Regulatory Committee agreed to permit the development, subject Page | 98 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?