Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Godalming; • Redhill; and, • Banstead. 13.43 The exact location of the depots has yet to be decided and the areas of search extend as far as 5 miles around each of the specified locations. The Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project Phase 1 Final Report, June 2009 indicates however that a rebuild of the existing ambulance station in Chertsey is proposed, on the same site as the existing. The proposed changes to facilities in Surrey are proposed to take place in 2014/15 (it should be noted however that there is no extant permission at the Chertsey Ambulance Station site for its redevelopment at the time of writing this report). Costs and funding sources 13.44 On 21st June 2007, the Department of Health announced that Ambulance Trusts would be eligible to apply for Foundation Trust (FT) status from 1st April 2009. SECAmb has applied for and achieved Foundation Trust status. This gives SECAmb more financial freedom and allows it to borrow funds as appropriate to support capital investments 43 . 13.45 It is considered reasonable to assume therefore that the redevelopment of the Chertsey Ambulance site would be funded by the South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust. Funding ID IDPF145 Risk Assessment Description Redevelopment of Chertsey Ambulance Station Estimated Cost Unknown Key Provider(s) South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 13.46 The population growth predicted in the Borough over the plan period, in conjunction with climate change and the threat of terrorism are considered to represent the biggest threats to SECAmb resources. It is envisaged however that SECAmb will carry out their own assessment of the how these factors will impact on their existing resources (which serve the Borough) and forward plan accordingly. Conclusion Risk ID Description Probability Severity IDPR046 Population growth High Low IDPR047 Climate change High High IDPR048 Threat of terrorism Low High 13.47 Overall, whilst a redevelopment of the Chertsey ambulance site is proposed during the plan period, the cost of any redevelopment scheme granted permission is considered most likely to be met by SECAmb. With the site redeveloped to provide improved facilities, it is considered that additional provision will not be required during the plan period. 43 Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project Phase 1 Final Report, June 2009/SECAmb website Page | 137 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Flooding and Flood Defences Existing conditions 13.48 Fluvial flooding from the River Thames and its tributaries (the Chertsey Bourne, the Addlestone Bourne and River Wey), are the primary sources of flooding in Runnymede. The greatest flood risk posed to the Borough is from the River Thames, which flows along the eastern boundary of the Borough, with the main urban areas of Egham, Chertsey and Addlestone lying (at least in part) in areas of high flood risk. In addition, the Basingstoke Canal and Wey Navigation discharge into the River Wey which forms the southern boundary of the Borough. 13.49 There is a long record of flooding from rivers in the Borough, and in particular from the River Thames. Major recorded flood events from the river occurred in 1898, 1947, 1968 and 2003, although the 2003 event was less severe than earlier events, partly due to local drainage improvements and upstream flood control measures. A severe flood risk warning was issued for the area in the summer of 2007, but the river did not actually overtop its banks despite coming very close to doing so. The Environment Agency also holds records of fluvial flooding in Runnymede for the years 1929, 1954, 1988 and 1990. 13.50 The Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan (2009) states that Runnymede is a Borough with over 5000 properties at risk in a 1% annual probability river flood. This makes the Borough one of the highest risk areas in the Lower Thames region. Indeed, Runnymede has been identified as one of the top 10 local authority areas for flood risk in England. There are no formal flood defences in the Borough, a formal defence being classified as a structure that is specifically built for the purposes of flood defence. Informal flood defences include structures that may act to contain flood water but were not originally constructed for that purpose, for example the M3 and M25 motorway and railway lines in the Borough. 13.51 There are areas of Surrey which have been broadly assessed as having “extensive” areas in Flood Zone 3, and without significant flood infrastructure, These areas are considered to not benefit from the minimum standard of protection. Within the Borough, Chertsey, Byfleet and Staines upon Thames are identified as three of these areas (Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project Phase 1 Final Report, June 2009). 13.52 As well as fluvial flooding there are other types of flooding which put areas of the Borough at risk, for example, ground water and surface water flooding, surcharging of sewers and breaching of reservoirs or canals. These are the responsibility of the Local Authority. Whilst there are reported incidences of both ground water and surface water flooding in the Borough, there is no known history of canal or reservoir breaches in Runnymede. The table below provides a summary of flood risks in Runnymede and areas which have either a history of flooding or which are potentially at risk (taken from Runnymede Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, May 2009). Page | 138 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70:
• Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72:
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74:
6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76:
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78:
Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80:
6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84:
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86:
IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170: following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172: 14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174: 14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178: consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180: 16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182: Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 199 and 200:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?