Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6.59 In Runnymede, 2,516 people were reported to travel to work by train in 2001 23 .This equates to a higher than average percentage (when contrasted with England as a whole) and is considered to reflect the accessibility of train stations in the Borough. 6.60 Table 15 below shows the usage of the Borough’s stations between 2002-2011. The figures show that usage of all the stations within the Borough has increased substantially between the period of 2002 and 2011 (between 48.8% and 365%). This high train usage correlates with the findings of the SWML Route Utilisation Study carried out in 2006. This study covered services running out of Waterloo to Surrey. Even at this time, it was identified that there were times in the high peak (0830 – 0845) when there were 20% passengers in excess of capacity (PIXC), again tying in with the above average train usage of Surrey (and Runnymede) commuters. Table 9-station usage in the Borough 2002-2011 Station Addleston e Annual usage 2002-03 174,214 Annual usage 2004-05 Annual usage 2005-06 Annual usage 2006-07 Annual usage 2007-08 Annual usage 2008-09 Annual usage 2009-10 Annual usage 2010-11 213,204 238,418 286,262 387,906 402,728 391,926 378,412 Change 2002- 2011 +117.2 % Chertsey 279,661 360,716 419,259 430,757 587,986 632,210 604,808 612,488 +119% Virginia Water 335,781 396,626 426,295 452,845 520,911 547,266 533,520 544,846 +62.3% Egham 1,184,035 1,475,611 1,507,099 1,611,558 2,023,075 2,134,388 2,072,946 2,069,282 +74.8% Byfleet and New Haw 262,141 300,039 282,560 320,676 409,799 417,098 384,168 390,188 +48.8% Longcross 2,298 266 346 2,637 5,353 7,596 9,650 10,686 +365% Total 2,238,130 2,746,462 2,873,977 3,104,735 3,935,030 4,141,286 3,997,018 4,005,902 +79% source: Office for Rail Regulations 2009 6.61 Egham Station is the most frequently used of all the stations in the Borough. The consistently high usage of this station is likely to be in part due to the student population of RHUL who generally reside in the Egham and Englefield Green areas. Local Plan 6.62 Local Plan location policies LP01-LP08 confirm the forecasted quantity and general location of new development in the Borough over the plan period. These policies conclude that development would largely be focussed in the Borough’s Urban Areas and at the DERA site in Longcross. Growth is also envisaged at RHUL. Development in all of these areas over the plan period is likely to increase the number of residents, students and commuters in the Borough using the rail network. 6.63 Strategic policy 9 (SP09): Sustainable Transport which should be read alongside the location policies states however that it will be sought to reduce reliance on the private car. Such a policy is likely to focus on encouraging a greater use of the rail infrastructure in the Borough. 23 census 2001 Page | 63 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected that the number of rail trips will rise by some 19% between 2005 and 2026 and approximately 15% over this same period in Runnymede. 24 Assuming that the 15% increase in rail trips is applicable to the inflow numbers, this would represent a new inflow of 5,614 per day. 6.65 The effects that development in Surrey will have over the coming years on the rail network are being assessed currently by SCC (who has commissioned ARUP). The results will be published in the Surrey Rail Strategy (expected publication date- Summer 2013). 6.66 It is also considered noteworthy that RHUL has aspirations to expand over the plan period. Some growth on the University campus would be allowed for by Local Plan (LP05) and would in all likelihood increase the use of Egham Railway Station. 6.67 The majority of planned development (with accompanying increase in population) over the plan period will be concentrated at the former DERA site (where 1500 units are expected, plus 80,000 m2 of commercial development). The remainder of the forecasted development is expected to come forward in the Borough’s Urban Areas (see: Table 4). 6.68 The Local Plan expects major new developments (for example at the former DERA site) to provide highway improvements to help mitigate against the transportation impacts that such developments generate. Future provision 6.69 By 2017, it is anticipated that overall demand at Waterloo will exceed total capacity by around 9,000 people per am peak (11%). Improvements to Waterloo Station are therefore planned to include lengthening of platforms to ease overcrowding (cost of works estimated at some £350 million) 25 . 6.70 The introduction of the Railway Communications System (RCS) is also expected to be rolled out countrywide. This system will provide secure communication between drivers and signallers across Britain’s entire passenger rail network – even in cuttings and tunnels. This system is currently being installed and will be effective from Summer 2014 (Network Rail website). 6.71 The only known works planned to any of the stations in the Borough are at Longcross Station. As part of the redevelopment of the former DERA site, improvements to this station are proposed which would consist of the provision of a new footbridge and ramp or refit/improvements to the exiting footbridge with ramp, provision of a new modular station building, an upgrade of station lighting, resurfacing of the platforms, two new waiting shelters, upgrading of station signage, ten platform benches, upgraded CCTV cameras and provision for appropriate disabled access to comply with Network Rail standards. Current stopping frequency will not be changed. Costs and funding sources 6.72 Development at DERA: The rail improvements proposed as part of the DERA development will be secured as part of the development. The cost of these works are unknown. 6.73 No other schemes within the Borough have been identified which could require additional funding. Whilst AIRTRACK was previously proposed, this scheme was shelved in April 2011. 24 Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Study (Jun 2009) 25 Department of Transport press release, July 2012. Page | 64 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26: o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28: LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30: Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38: Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54: 5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128:
Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130:
IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132:
11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?