Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a ‘Key <strong>Infrastructure</strong> Providers Workshop’ (KIPW 2010) to all relevant stakeholders<br />
including neighbouring authorities. The KIPW 2010 convened on 29 th July 2010. The<br />
information already stored in the database was reviewed, and <strong>Infrastructure</strong> Providers<br />
also provided additional information on infrastructure capacity and demand issues, as<br />
well as on any programmes of work in the pipe-line that were designed to address<br />
those needs.<br />
1.9 Subsequent stages in the project have involved discussions with specific infrastructure<br />
providers such as Surrey County <strong>Council</strong> (Transport, Education, and Libraries<br />
departments in particular), the Environment Agency and utility providers. Internal<br />
discussions have also taken place with various <strong>Council</strong> departments who are involved<br />
in the provision of social and green infrastructure (including the Community Services<br />
team and the Leisure department).<br />
1.10 The information obtained from these discussions has informed the contents of this<br />
current version of the IDP and IS. The IS summarises the projects noted in the IDP but<br />
additionally considers which of the infrastructure is essential and which is desirable.<br />
Essential infrastructure in this context represents items without which the development<br />
forecast in the Local <strong>Plan</strong> could not come forward. Desirable infrastructure represents<br />
items which, whilst not vital to unlock growth, will support growth and benefit local<br />
communities over the plan period.<br />
Structure of Document<br />
1.11 The remainder of this report is structured as follows:<br />
• Chapter 2: Provides the context for infrastructure planning in <strong>Runnymede</strong>,<br />
covering areas such as social, economic and environmental characteristics,<br />
and sets out the main policy context in which the provision of infrastructure<br />
resides. The chapter describes current and future roles of <strong>Runnymede</strong>’s Local<br />
Strategic Partnership (LSP) and Local Economic Partnership (LEP) in<br />
infrastructure planning and delivery, and then moves on to consider the role<br />
of the <strong>Council</strong>’s Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) and Corporate <strong>Plan</strong><br />
(CP). The chapter ends by focusing on the <strong>Council</strong>’s emerging Local <strong>Plan</strong>.<br />
• Chapter 3: Establishes the main infrastructure designations and subdesignations<br />
in relation to <strong>Runnymede</strong>. It defines ‘physical’, ‘social’ and<br />
‘green’ infrastructure and identifies who is currently responsible for delivery –<br />
the delivery agencies;<br />
• Chapter 4: Explains the methodology adopted for preparing this IDP and IS<br />
and the assumptions made in relation to the amount, type and distribution of<br />
development and population projections;<br />
• Chapter 5: Considers the amount and distribution of planned residential and<br />
commercial development over the plan period;<br />
• Chapters 6 to 15: Within these chapters, infrastructure designations are<br />
systematically assessed and appraised against the demand identified in<br />
Chapter 5. Commencing with a brief introduction, each chapter draws<br />
together and considers the following:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Existing conditions;<br />
Future provision;<br />
Local <strong>Plan</strong> implications;<br />
Costs and funding sources;<br />
Risk assessment; and,<br />
Page | 13<br />
<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>