Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

the Local Plan (LP01 LP02 and LP08). Strategic policy SP09 is also considered relevant in this case. This policy encourages people to use sustainable modes of transport wherever possible to access facilities. 5.58 Runnymede Borough Council has provided SCC with their expected housing projections over the plan period, in particular providing SCC officers with the minimum (2415) and maximum estimations (4512). As noted in previous chapters, SCC has based their forecasts on a mid-point figure in this range and has assumed that the number of new dwellings where pupils would be yielded between 2013 to 2025 would be in the region of 3284 (or 3185 after 1 bedroom properties are excluded from the calculations (see the ‘Pre-school Childcare (Early Years Provision) and Children’s Centres’ chapter for more information on this point). 5.59 Estimations of pupil numbers arising from these new dwellings is based on 0.18 pupils per dwelling as published in the Surrey Education Formula. On this basis, between 2013 and 2025, it is estimated that 573 secondary pupils will be generated. This equates to 19 additional classrooms (based on a classroom size of 30). Future provision 5.60 Secondary demand follows primary demand. SCC estimates of the future need for secondary places is based on taking the historic transfer ratio from Year 6 to Year 7 in the Borough, and applying this to their estimated numbers for future Year 6 cohorts. The table below estimates (as at November 2011) the numbers of pupils that will require a secondary school place in Runnymede from 2012 – 2021. This is compared to the total number of available places in secondary schools in Runnymede in the future (the PAN). The ‘spare’ places refer to the projected demand compared to the total number of available places. Table 6-number of pupils that will require a secondary school place in Runnymede (2012-2021) Year PAN Pupils in Year 7 Spare Year 7 places 2012/2013 915 916 -1 2013/2014 915 851 64 2014/2015 915 914 1 2015/2016 915 914 1 2016/2017 915 889 26 2017/2018 915 968 -53 2018/2019 915 1000 -85 2019/2020 915 1030 -115 2020/2021 915 1057 -142 2021/2022 915 1065 -150 5.61 By the end of 2021, it is anticipated that there will be a need for about 150 extra places at the intake year (year 7). This is equivalent to 5 additional forms of entry. There is projected to be a shortage of secondary school places in the Borough by 2017/2018. A form of entry is equivalent to 30 pupils or 1 ‘class’. Adding a single form of entry equates to 5 extra classrooms in the secondary setting as pupils move through the school. Secondary schools provide for much larger catchment areas than primary schools and officers plan secondary provision across Borough boundaries. There are interrelationships between the Boroughs of Runnymede, Woking, Spelthorne and Surrey Heath. Page | 41 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis that, by 2021, between 6-8 additional forms of entry in Woking will be required, 4 forms of entry in Spelthorne and between 5 and 6 additional forms of entry in Runnymede. There are expected to be sufficient secondary school places in Surrey Heath during this period. Officers at SCC have met with schools to discuss how this demand could be met but these discussions are at a relatively early stage and plans have not yet been defined to the point where individual projects can be named. 5.63 In terms of school expansion which is planned within Runnymede, against the lack of development in Runnymede’s state school sector, private schools continue to expand. Most noteworthy expansion plans which the Council is aware of at the Borough’s secondary schools are listed as follows: 5.64 Expansion and rationalisation of facilities both on and off campus up to 2015-2018 at The American School in Switzerland (TASIS). This is following the approval of a masterplan at the site in 2008 (under RU.07/1153). The proposals would allow for an increase in the number of students from 725 to 800. 5.65 In 2010, outline permission was granted (RU.10/0025) for a 10 year outline Master Plan at Sir William Perkins’s School (outlining proposed works on campus up to 2020). Since this time, a number of reserved matters applications have been approved for various elements of the masterplan under RU.10/0422 and RU.11/0292. 5.66 The DERA site is expected to generate around 491 pupils of secondary school age. This is considered to be too small a number to generate the provision of an additional stand alone Secondary School in the Borough, however it is possible that when combined with potential shortfalls in provision in the surrounding area that a secondary school at DERA could become a viable option. Costs and funding sources 5.67 Currently there are no state school expansion plans. 5.68 The alterations and extensions proposed to TASIS and Sir William Perkins’s School will be funded privately. The costs are unknown. Funding ID IDPF010 IDPF011 Description Expansion and rationalisation of facilities at TASIS New facilities at Sir William Perkins’s School Estimated Cost Unknown Unknown Key Provider(s) TASIS Sir William Perkins’s School 5.69 DCSF Cost Multipliers have been used to estimate the expected cost per pupil of a typical secondary school building project. In 2008/09 the capital cost of a secondary school place was approximately £18,469. This figure is commonly used by Local Authorities to estimate school building projects. The figure is based on 2008/09, prices and therefore needs to be index linked. Based on the Building Cost Information Service figures, the cost of general school building projects decreased by 8.6% between Q3 2008 and Q3 2011 (£/m2). A location factor of 1.12 is applicable to projects in Surrey to reflect the higher costs in the South East when compared to the national average. The following calculations therefore provide the cost per place for a secondary school place, accurate from Q3 2011. SCC has not updated this calculation to present day to keep the assessment of costs consistent with those provided to other Boroughs and Districts. It should be noted that the following per place calculation does not factor in the costs of land acquisition, site abnormalities or any other exceptional costs that might be incurred. However, it is deemed a reasonable benchmark for a typical secondary school building project. Page | 42 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2: IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4: Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6: 13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8: 25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10: the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12: Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14: provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16: CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18: Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20: Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22: Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26: o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28: LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30: Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38: Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104:
Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106:
Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110:
in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120:
Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124:
Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128:
Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130:
IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132:
11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?