Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Future provision 14.107 There is no planned expansion of this type of infrastructure in the Borough at this time (in terms of physical infrastructure or facilities). Changes to how these services are accessed and the need of young people along with budgetary pressures means it is unlikely any new provision will occur. Capacities are currently not full and as such, a need to adapt and revise existing provision is the most likely outcome over the plan period to offer an attractive service to meet the needs of young people and to provide the resultant benefits in associated areas of education, employment and a safer community. Costs and funding sources 14.108 This section is not applicable in this instance given that there is no known planned expansion of this type of infrastructure in the Borough over the plan period. Risk Assessment 14.109 Based on conversations with officers from this sector, the main impacts and risks to this type of infrastructure are considered to be whether it can remain user-friendly and accessible. Other infrastructure such as public transport already impact on how young people access the various services, restricted by existing bus services. Further reductions in bus services would further impact on those who are most deprived and disadvantaged. Conclusion Risk ID Description Probability Severity IDPR053 Reduced accessibility to youth centres Medium High 14.110 The challenges within this area do not so much relate to lack of provision but to continuing to develop this offer to keep it relevant and engaging with young people in the Borough in order to sustain its provision over the plan period. Places of worship Existing conditions 14.111 Seventy five percent of Surrey’s population said they were Christian in the 2001 census. The next largest religion in the County at this time was Muslim, which made up 1% of the population. A national study has shown however that of those who claim to be Christian, only 32% of Christians actively practice their religion, compared with 80% of Muslims. The Borough in Surrey with the largest Muslim population is Woking, and that with the largest Jewish population is Elmbridge. (Surrey i-2001 census: key statistics for Surrey and Districts, and JSNA chapter-Religion, May 2011). 14.112 In Runnymede itself, in 2009, 81.5% of the population identified themselves as white British (JSNA chapter, ethnicity). In addition small percentages of other ethnicities such as Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black Caribbean, Black African and Chinese were reported. 14.113 Surrey Faith Links estimated in 2010 there were in the region of 45 faith organisations and places of worship across the Borough. Whilst the majority of these are Christian places of worship, the Surrey Muslim Centre is located in Albert Road in Addlestone (previously St Augustine Church of England) and there is also a Society of Friends (Quakers) meeting house in Egham. There are no synagogues within the Borough, although the nearest two synagogues are located in Horvath Close, Weybridge (The North West Surrey Synagogue) and in Westbrook Road, Staines (The Staines and District Synagogue), Page | 159 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
14.114 Recently, two churches (Church of England & Methodist) in Englefield Green have merged and become St Judes United Church, with the unused Englefield Green Methodist Church converted to a village centre with a number of community facilities (Revd Sue Loveday, coordinator of Churches Together in Surrey). 14.115 As communities becomes more diverse there is a need for sufficient buildings to allow for people of various faiths and ethnic backgrounds to worship locally. Local Plan 14.116 Strategic Policy SP04 seeks to secure the retention of existing community infrastructure that meets local needs, unless it can be demonstrated that alternative provision can be made as part of development proposals, or the loss of any facility can be fully justified. Future provision 14.117 There have been a number of noteworthy planning approvals in the Borough in recent years relating to places of worship. These are detailed as follows: • Erection of a new youth club/church hall following the demolition of the existing hall at Community Hall, 96 Woodham Lane & Land at All Saints Church New Haw (approved under RU.08/0256) (completed). • An extension was granted to the Surrey Muslim Centre, Albert Road, Addlestone in 2008 to provide a washroom, toilet and cold room for storage of deceased prior to burial (approved under RU.08/0691) (under construction). • Erection of 2 storey Church Centre at St John the Baptist Church, High Street, Egham incorporating glazed link to Grade II* Listed Church and part single storey, part two storey extension to existing church following demolition of existing Church Centre and existing lean to extension on eastern side of existing Church (approved under RU.11/1029). Not yet implemented. • Extensions have been granted at Christ Church, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water (originally approved under RU.09/0078 and time limit for implementation extended under RU.11/1230) although the permission has not yet been implemented. • Extensions have been granted at St Judes United Church, St Judes Road, Englefield Green (under RU.12/0281) although the permission has not yet been implemented. 14.118 There are no other known plans to provide new places of worship in the Borough or expand existing facilities. Costs and funding sources 14.119 The extensions to the places of worship summarised above will be funded privately. Funding ID IDPF154 IDPF155 IDPF156 IDPF157 Description Extensions to the Surrey Muslim Centre, Albert Road, Addlestone Erection of new Church Centre at St John the Baptist Church, High Street, Egham Erection of extensions at Christ Church, Christchurch Rd, VW Erection of extensions at St Judes United Church, Englefield Green Estimated Cost Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Key Provider(s) Funded privately Funded privately Funded privately Funded privately Page | 160 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34:
Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36:
Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38:
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40:
Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42:
• The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44:
5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48:
eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50:
IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54:
5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56:
5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58:
Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64:
Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66:
Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70:
• Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72:
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74:
6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76:
6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78:
Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80:
6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82:
Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84:
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86:
IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98:
Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100:
Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104:
Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106:
Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110:
in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120: Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124: Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136: Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138: 12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140: Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142: expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144: Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146: percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148: 13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150: Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152: of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154: Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156: with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158: 14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160: 14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162: • Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164: 14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166: 14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168: • reduced budgets internally with
Page 169: following centres and as part of th
Page 173 and 174: 14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176: Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178: consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180: 16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182: Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 211 and 212: Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214: Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216: Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218: TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220: Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?