13.01.2015 Views

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• reduced budgets internally within RBC, given the budget review and<br />

pressures to reduce spending across the authority; discretionary services<br />

such as these are at risk.<br />

• other infrastructure changes such as access to services and public transport<br />

with potential reductions of bus services, access to healthcare, with potential<br />

changes as a result of NHS reform.<br />

14.94 In the current climate, there is considered to be a medium to high risk of these<br />

scenarios occurring (either alone or in combination).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Risk ID Description Probability Severity<br />

IDPR053<br />

Income reductions from people not<br />

using the services<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

IDPR054 Reduced budgets internally within RBC High High<br />

14.95 As outlined in Section 8, Health, there is a significant change in the Government’s<br />

approach to caring for elderly people, with an emphasis on independent living. Overall<br />

it is considered that there are sufficient facilities and capacity within the <strong>Borough</strong> to<br />

accommodate growth during the plan period. RBC strategies will continue to develop<br />

innovative ‘Ageing Well’ approaches alongside partner agencies to deliver the<br />

necessary services in an ageing society.<br />

14.96 The challenges within this area are not so much in lack of provision but raising<br />

awareness across organisations of what actually is available and engaging with the<br />

community to tailor the service.<br />

Youth Centres<br />

Existing conditions<br />

14.97 SCC is responsible for the majority of the services offered to this age group, with RBC<br />

responsible for schemes such as holiday clubs and day trips as well as acting in a<br />

consultee role to inform developments within this infrastructure designation.<br />

14.98 The County is continuing to review it’s spending across a range of services. As a result,<br />

this particular provision has gone through and is still going through a restructuring<br />

process to reduce spending and revise the services it offers young people; in order to<br />

meet their needs and to increase participation.<br />

14.99 In 2009, SCC’s ‘Surrey Children & Young People’s <strong>Plan</strong>’ identified key priorities for<br />

children and young people, including access to integrated local services. A key<br />

objective of the plan was to deliver the right services, in the right place. This agenda is<br />

still current and the Government emphasises the role this sector plays in supporting<br />

young people and achieving its ambitions that no young person is outside some form of<br />

education, employment or training (people who fall under the category of ‘Not in<br />

employment, education or training’ or NEET).<br />

14.100 Ten thousand 10-19 year olds live in the <strong>Borough</strong>. 95% of those aged 16-19 and above<br />

participate in some form of education, employment or training 53 . No wards in<br />

<strong>Runnymede</strong> have a higher proportion of NEET young people than the South East<br />

regional average (which is at 5.6%). Englefield Green and Egham Hythe were found to<br />

have the highest number of NEET young people between August 2009 and July 2010<br />

at 3% and 4.3% respectively. The number of NEET young people in Egham Hythe<br />

53<br />

Surrey County <strong>Council</strong> Publication ‘The local offer in <strong>Runnymede</strong>: Participation for all Surrey young people, 2012)<br />

Page | 156<br />

<strong>Runnymede</strong> IDP DRAFT – <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!