Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Costs and funding sources 6.41 It is not known what all of the schemes identified in the ‘future provision’ section will cost, although road safety schemes put forward by SCC are typically funded by the Runnymede Local Committee from their Integrated Transport Scheme (ITS) budget, S106 /PIC contributions and Member allocation funding. 6.42 The proposed works at the Runnymede roundabout are estimated to cost in the region of £5 million. Surrey County Council has confirmed that it is anticipated that the works would be funded by one or more of the following: Surrey Council, S.106 money, regional infrastructure funding, LEP money. It is not yet known how the proposed works to Staines Upon Thames Bridge would be funded, although the options that are being considered at the current time would have an estimated cost of between £8.1 million and £12.6 million. 6.43 The highway improvements as part of the DERA development are likely to be initially funded by the developer, for example, the developer would be expected to fully fund the initial capital cost of the new bus service. There is however currently no mechanism in place to ensure that the longer term revenue costs of such services/improvements are met by the developer. For example, it would be unreasonable to expect the developer to pay for the on going running costs of the proposed bus service. As a result, there is a potential funding shortfall. 6.44 It is envisaged that any highway improvements which may come forward as a result of development at RHUL would be funded by the University. 6.45 The table below summarises the schemes expected to come forward over the plan period, their estimated costs where known, and the key providers. Funding ID Description Estimated Cost Key Provider(s) IDPF014 Works to Runnymede roundabout £5 million SCC IDPF015 IDPF016 IDPF017 IDPF018 IDPF019 Highway improvements at Egham High Street/Church Road Egham £150,000 SCC Road safety scheme at Whitehall Lane, Egham £3,000 SCC £15,000 (road closure Wapshott Road road safety scheme option) £75,000 SCC (traffic calming option) Englefield Green and Eghamcontrolled parking zones £100,000* SCC Widening of High Street and Station Road, adjustment to Church Road and Crouch Oak Lane, Addlestone £1,500,000* SCC IDPF020 IDPF021 A317 St Peter’s Way-dedicated M25 lane proposed (feasibility and design only) Safety improvements at A318 Chertsey Road, on approach to Addlestone Moor roundabout £5,000 SCC £11,500 SCC Page | 59 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Road safety scheme at Guildford Road/St. Peters Way £20,000 SCC Lyne Crossing Road/Bridge Lane/Lyne Lane-safety improvements proposed Highway improvements at Chobham Lane/Burma Road, Longcross; Carriageway widening at roundabout to increase capacity £10,000 SCC Unknown Developer Chobham Lane, Longcross: new roundabout to serve the DERA site Unknown Developer IDPF026 IDPF027 Highway improvements at Trumps Green Road/Wellington Avenue, Longcross; Signalisation of existing priority T-junction Works to Staines upon Thames bridge TOTAL COST Unknown Between £8.1 million and £12.6 million In excess of £14,914,500 Developer SCC *estimated early costings which are subject to change as proposals progress through consultation and/or detailed design Risk Assessment 6.46 Risk ID IDPR007, as with IDPR004, relates to the production of an effective and robust sustainable transport strategy for the Borough. Again, it is acknowledged that such a strategy might not be achieved over the plan period. As a result, congestion on the non-strategic road network could increase to an unacceptable level. This could have a knock on effect for congestion on the strategic road network and could reduce the desirability of the Borough for residents and businesses to live in and operate from. It is likely that this could have implications for economic growth within the Borough. The likelihood of Risk IDPR007 occurring is considered high, given the fact that to date, and in spite of numerous transport strategies and company travel plans being in place, the effect of congestion across the Borough appears to continue to increase. The severity of this risk is also considered to be high. 6.47 Risk ID IDPR008 is concerned with the affects of accelerated climate change on the ability of the network to function to capacity, as a result of adaptation inaction on the part of the network provider/users. This is a recognised and credible universal risk to this type of infrastructure and one that the Council has limited control over. The probability of recurring disruption to the network as a result of extreme weather events is considered medium given the fact that events such as snow or heavy rain generally presents more on the non-strategic road network than the strategic network. The severity is considered to be high. 6.48 The impact that Runnymede's Local Plan will have on the non-SRN is being assessed in the SCC TIA 2012 (yet to be issued). It is likely that the TIA will confirm that any increase in traffic as a result of implementation of the Local Plan will not significantly affect the non-SRN. The Surrey County Council Technical Note entitled ‘transport measures to support growth identified in the Runnymede Borough Core Strategy’ (June 2012), provides details of how the County Council seek to target congestion and road safety over the plan period. 6.49 Cumulatively, it is likely that specific elevations in traffic from developments such as DERA (LP01, LP02, and LP08), would in combination with similar developments in Page | 60 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20: Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22: Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26: o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28: LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30: Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38: Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54: 5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120: Costs and funding sources 10.38 The
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124:
Costs and funding sources 10.54 The
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128:
Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130:
IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132:
11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?