Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Local Plan 6.105 The location policies in the Local Plan (LPCS); LP01-LP08, confirm where new development is expected in the Borough over the plan period. Development would largely be focussed in the Borough’s Urban Areas and at the former DERA site in Longcross. Development in all of these areas over the plan period is likely to increase the number of residents and businesses in the Borough. 6.106 Strategic policy 9 (SP09): Sustainable Transport which should be read alongside the location policies states however that it will be sought to reduce reliance on the private car. Such a policy is likely to encourage greater cycling and walking opportunities in the Borough. 6.107 The Surrey County Council Rights of Way Improvement Plan encourages Local planning policies to reflect and support the aims of their Plan, in particular by securing developer contributions for local rights of way improvements. Future Provision 6.108 The Surrey County Council Rights of Way Improvement Plan (2007) states that in Surrey, proposed built development is the single biggest threat to the rights of way network, both through the actual loss of paths and their incorporation into estate roads. Development does however offer many opportunities, both for the creation of new routes and the enhancement of existing ones. 6.109 When considering future provision more generally, Surrey County Council has stated in its Rights of Way Improvement Plan that it aims to improve accessibility, connectivity and quality across the rights of way network. This document also states that Surrey County Council: • will use its powers under the Highways Act to create and divert public rights of way to improve connectivity. • is committed to maintaining the rights of way network to a basic minimum standard in accordance with its legal duty, as set out in the Rights of Way Statement for Surrey. 6.110 In addition, one of the objectives of the Surrey Transport Plan (April 2011) is to increase the proportion of travel by sustainable modes such as walking and cycling. 6.111 In particular, within the Borough, Surrey CC proposes to create a new multi-user route along the northern boundary of the former DERA site from the station to Chobham Lane (works to include the laying of an all weather surface and signing). 6.112 The creation of a multi-user route from the A.320 through Homewood Park to Stonehill Road (length 900m) is also proposed (works to include the laying of an all weather surface and signing). 6.113 In addition, the Egham Sustainable Transport Package is proposed by Surrey CC which contains a package of 29 cycling and walking infrastructure measures in Runnymede Borough, concentrating on railway line crossing points that could be crossed easily by walking or cycling. The measures include provision of two cutthroughs, conversion of three pelican crossings to toucan crossings, provision of a new toucan crossing, four footbridges with wheeling ramps for cycles, a link to a cycle track, subway resurfacing, widening of five footways, conversion of four footways to shared use, refreshing of shared use lining and logos, tarmac widening of approaches to a subway and removal of barriers, footway clearance, improvement of two pedestrian crossings, conversion of a cycle track and conversion of road cushions to speed tables, cycle route signing Egham-wide and cycle storage improvements at Egham Station. Page | 71 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benefit of the proposed improvements to the cycle network in the Egham area is the impact it would have on traffic congestion. Peak hour congestion in the Egham area is a serious impediment to future economic activity. Promoting economic activity is an important consideration in the Local Plan being prepared for the Borough. The Local Plan looks forward to the year 2026 and seeks to accommodate significant growth for commercial, retail and residential development. Simply adding further traffic to an overloaded network pinch point will not form the basis of good planning. Action is needed to unlock further growth potential by implementing this scheme and this can be aided by offering an alternative form of sustainable transport for those who live, work and visit the area. If people are to be encouraged to use a cycle network it must be comprehensive, attractive, and safe. This proposal addresses these issues. 6.115 The following smaller schemes are also proposed across the Borough by SCC: • Wapshott Road/ Bowes Road/ St Pauls/, Hythe, pedestrian and cyclists improvements proposed by 2017 • Langton Way to Crouch Oak-pedestrian and cyclists improvements proposed by 2015 • A30 London Road/ St Judes Road-provision of controlled pedestrian facilities by 2016 • Installation of pedestrian crossing at Scotland Bridge Road, Addlestone by 2017 • Simplemarsh Road/High Street, Addlestone-pedestrian improvements by 2016 • Green Lane, Addlestone-proposed pedestrian crossing by 2015 • Proposed pedestrian refuge on A318 Chertsey Road/ Green Road, Addlestone by 2015 • Advanced stop lanes on Brighton Road/Crockford Park Road, Addlestone (timescales unknown) • Advanced stop lanes on Brighton Road, Addlestone (timescales unknown) • Proposed cycle track-Green Lane/High Street to Crouch Oak Lane, Addlestone (timescales unknown) • Holloway Hill, Chertsey-footway improvements by 2017 • Installation of a pedestrian crossing at Guildford Street, Chertsey by 2015 • Bridge Road/Weir Road junction, Chertsey-capacity and pedestrian improvements by 2017 • Eastworth Road, Guildford Street, Pycroft Road, Chertsey-cyclist right hand turn lane (timescales unknown) • Abbots Way, Pycroft, Guildford Street, Chertsey-advanced stop lanes (timescales unknown) • Guildford Street, Chertsey-additional signage (timescales unknown) • Drill Hall Road/ Heriot Road, Chertsey-link between the two roads (timescales unknown) • Guildford Street, Eastworth Road to Curfew Bell Road, Chertsey-northbound cycle track (timescales unknown) Page | 72 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2:
IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6:
13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8:
25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10:
the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12:
Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14:
provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16:
CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18:
Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20:
Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22:
Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26:
o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28:
LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30:
Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35 and 36: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 37 and 38: Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54: 5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88: 6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92: above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94: Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96: Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98: Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100: Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104: Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106: Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110: in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114: Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116: predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118: • Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 121 and 122: Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128: Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130: IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132: 11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?