Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 3. Methodology Overall Approach 3.1 The overall approach to infrastructure planning in Runnymede has been guided and informed by the Surrey Improvement Partnership Surrey Infrastructure Capacity Project 7 . It has also been influenced by the former PPS12 and good practice guidance, including ‘A Steps Approach to Infrastructure Planning and Delivery’ (June 2009), published by the Planning Advisory Service (PAS) 8 . The seven steps included in this guidance are set out in Table 3 below, together with commentary on how infrastructure planning in Runnymede is taking account of the guidance. Table 3 - A Steps Approach to Infrastructure Planning Step Commentary: The Runnymede Approach Step 1: Vision/Policy Context 1.1 Set out the long-term vision for the area. 1.2 Establish a sustainable community strategy delivery strategy. Step 2: Governance 2.1 Set up a group for infrastructure and asset management / establish working arrangements and engagement between stakeholders. • Overarching vision being established in emerging Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS). • Spatial planning strategy is emerging as part of Local Plan. • Local Plan acts as a Delivery Plan. • Key Infrastructure Providers Workshop (KIPW 2010) acts as spring board for RBC engaging with broad range of delivery agencies. • Re-tasked LSP to be focused on infrastructure provision and delivery following KIP Workshop Step 3: Evidence Gathering 3.1 Undertake a resource overview. 3.2 Identify existing public sector capital programme commitments and private sector developments. 3.3 Identify existing public service delivery outlets and potential for joint use. 3.4 Use public sector assets as resources base for local area regeneration and redevelopment. • A resource overview is being developed by way of a number of studies that form part of the evidence base for the Local Plan (for example the SAR, Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), Local Climate Impact Profile (LCLIP), and former PPG17 Assessments) (local assessment still required). • Public sector capital programmes are identified in consultation with delivery agencies and reported in the IS. • Future private residential investment identified in Housing Trajectory as presented in the Annual Monitoring Review (AMR). Climate Change Risk Assessment 3.2 The Climate Change Act 2008 9 provides a legally binding framework for the UK to cut carbon emissions and improve its ability to adapt to climate change. It also requires the Secretary of State to report to Parliament every 5 years on the assessment of risk posed to the UK by the impacts of climate change. The “UK Climate Change Risk 7 See: http://www.surreyimprovement.info/sicp 8 A Steps Approach to Infrastructure Planning and Delivery (June 2009), Planning Advisory Service http://www.pas.gov.uk/pas/aio/109121 9 The Climate Change Act 2008. Available from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/ukpga_20080027_en_1 Page | 25 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Assessment” (CCRA) is intended to bring together the evidence on the consequences of climate change across UK Sectors and Regions to inform the development of a National Adaptation Programme. 3.3 Following the recent change in Government, and the suspension of National Indicator 188, work in terms of Runnymede’s climate change adaptation has been suspended pending further clarification of what involvement the Government want Local Authorities to have. 3.4 In May 2010 however, Officers concluded a draft of the Council’s Local Climate Impacts Profile (LCLIP) in response to a reporting requirement under National Indicator 188 (NI188). The LCLIP incorporates the findings from the Surrey LCLIP that was carried out between June and September 2009 and includes specific findings relevant to Runnymede. The aim was to provide an overview of extreme weather events over the previous 10 years in Runnymede and assess the implications on delivery of Council services, and the effects on infrastructure capacity. This profile was intended to inform a more comprehensive risk assessment. Delivery Periods 3.5 The emerging Local Plan is setting out how new development will be planned for and managed up to 2026 (13 years from the expected adoption of the Local Plan in 2013). For the purposes of infrastructure planning, forecasts for development have been divided into two five-year development periods and one three year period, based on financial years (April to April) as set out below. • Period 1 (2013/14 to 2017/18); • Period 2 (2018/19 to 2022/23); and • Period 3 (2023/24 to 2025/26). 3.6 Proposals by delivery agencies for new facilities in Period 1 are likely to be relatively certain as they will be based on existing and emerging strategies, delivery plans, and capital programmes. The degree of certainty over the delivery of new or improved facilities is however likely to decrease and level of risk increase over time. This is one reason why the IDP should be viewed as a ‘living document’ and monitored and updated as necessary. Page | 26 Runnymede IDP DRAFT – February 2013
Page 1 and 2: IDP Infrastructure Delivery Plan Fe
Page 3 and 4: Executive Summary 1 The Infrastruct
Page 5 and 6: 13 With regard to Higher Education,
Page 7 and 8: 25 Despite the forecasts for housin
Page 9 and 10: the Borough’s SANGS over the plan
Page 11 and 12: Kent, Surrey and Sussex. There is o
Page 13 and 14: provision will occur over the plan
Page 15 and 16: CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ..
Page 17 and 18: Costs and funding sources .........
Page 19 and 20: Conclusion ........................
Page 21 and 22: Local Plan ........................
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1. Introduction What is the
Page 25 and 26: o Conclusion. 1.12 The report is su
Page 27 and 28: LPAs should work collaboratively wi
Page 29 and 30: Runnymede Borough Councils Sustaina
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-Total CO2 emissions for Ru
Page 33 and 34: Groups and Partnerships Local Econo
Page 35: Services (RAVS), which is the coord
Page 39 and 40: Table 4 - Location of Potential Res
Page 41 and 42: • The Haven Sure Start Children's
Page 43 and 44: 5.18 As noted in the Local Plan sec
Page 45 and 46: Figure 7- Primary, Junior and Infan
Page 47 and 48: eception places’ column refers to
Page 49 and 50: IDPF008 One additional 1fe infant e
Page 51 and 52: Figure 9-location of secondary educ
Page 53 and 54: 5.62 SCC is planning on the basis t
Page 55 and 56: 5.77 Students within Runnymede can
Page 57 and 58: Local Plan community learning (ACL)
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 6. Transport Introduction 6
Page 61 and 62: Figure 11 - Runnymede's Strategic R
Page 63 and 64: Risk Assessment 6.13 The production
Page 65 and 66: Table 7 - Cars and vans in Runnymed
Page 67 and 68: Figure 14- SHMA Population Age Proj
Page 69 and 70: • Englefield Green and Egham-cont
Page 71 and 72: IDPF022 IDPF023 IDPF024 IDPF025 Roa
Page 73 and 74: 6.54 All of the stations in the Bor
Page 75 and 76: 6.64 Across Surrey, it is expected
Page 77 and 78: Borough is presented in Table 16 be
Page 79 and 80: 6.89 In addition, the Egham Sustain
Page 81 and 82: Table 11 - Five Dimensions of Trave
Page 83 and 84: 6.114 Surrey CC advise that a benef
Page 85 and 86: IDPF049 IDPF050 IDPF051 IDPF052 IDP
Page 87 and 88:
6.127 As aforementioned earlier in
Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 7. Health Introduction 7.1
Page 91 and 92:
above average patient targets (both
Page 93 and 94:
Future provision 7.28 The cumulativ
Page 95 and 96:
Table 13 - % Population aged 65 and
Page 97 and 98:
Local Plan the Council and County t
Page 99 and 100:
Costs and funding sources 7.55 The
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 8. Utilities Introduction 8
Page 103 and 104:
Local Plan 8.17 The location polici
Page 105 and 106:
Risk Assessment 8.30 The main risks
Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 9. Waste Management Introdu
Page 109 and 110:
in very special circumstances. It s
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 10. Green Infrastructure In
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 19- National and County desi
Page 115 and 116:
predominantly lowland heath land an
Page 117 and 118:
• Hare Hill open space: divides t
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 20 -natural and semi urban g
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 11. Leisure Facilities Intr
Page 127 and 128:
Other • Refurbishment/replacement
Page 129 and 130:
IDPF108 IDPF109 IDPF110 IDPF111 IDP
Page 131 and 132:
11.28 It is considered unlikely tha
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 12. Culture and Heritage In
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 22- (map 2 of 2) historic an
Page 137 and 138:
12.16 The Surrey Arts Partnership i
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 13. Emergency Services Intr
Page 141 and 142:
expected in the Borough up to 2026.
Page 143 and 144:
Funding ID IDPF127 IDPF128 IDPF129
Page 145 and 146:
percentage of the population receiv
Page 147 and 148:
13.37 Chertsey Ambulance Station ha
Page 149 and 150:
Flooding and Flood Defences Existin
Page 151 and 152:
of works within the context of a 10
Page 153 and 154:
Chapter 14. Community Services and
Page 155 and 156:
with sufficient public transport pr
Page 157 and 158:
14.21 The Bourne Car Park in Virgin
Page 159 and 160:
14.35 Changes in the nature of libr
Page 161 and 162:
• Increased IT costs, in infrastr
Page 163 and 164:
14.63 RBC has been responding to th
Page 165 and 166:
14.77 Community Transport: Runnymed
Page 167 and 168:
• reduced budgets internally with
Page 169 and 170:
following centres and as part of th
Page 171 and 172:
14.114 Recently, two churches (Chur
Page 173 and 174:
14.126 Whilst cremation is an alter
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 15. Delivery Governance Arr
Page 177 and 178:
consultation at each stage of produ
Page 179 and 180:
16.6 The table below outlines the t
Page 181 and 182:
Type of infrastructure Component Sc
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Left Intentionally Blank
Page 213 and 214:
Term EY FE (either 1, 2 or 3) GiA G
Page 215 and 216:
Term SOIS SPA SRN SSSI SWML SWT TAS
Page 217 and 218:
TERM Planning Policy Statement PPPs
Page 219 and 220:
Ottershaw Chase 2012/13 Make a feat
Page 221 and 222:
Hare Hill 2013 -2017 2013/14 Homewo
Page 223 and 224:
Planned Maintenance 2014-2017 (plea
Page 225:
All enquiries about this paper shou
show all

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (Feb 2013) - Runnymede Borough Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?